Dinosaur and Lisp
vito.sdf.org
Dinosaur and Lisp
1–10 of 97 posts
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#2Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#3My god, how have I seen that error page a million times and never realized it was actually a video game?
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#4My god, how have I seen that error page a million times and never realized it was actually a video game?
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#5Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#6Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#7Quite inspiring. That's how you beat an endless game.
To beat the dino game, the author played the "write a game AI" game. That's a much harder game, which is going to take a while to beat. The general gameplaying work being done at the moment stands a good chance (e.g. DeepMind's Atari playing system, AIXI approximations, etc.), although I still think Nomic is a harder game to beat than Go ;)
After that, we can start playing the "write an AI generator" game. The fun never stops!
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#8Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/advantage LISP had on other languages, it waned in the 90's (maybe Viaweb was one of the last projects done in LISP, and even that was translated later to other langs...)
I don't think s-expressions are _that_ problematic. The main issue with LISP's nowadays is lack of _momentum_. Java gained its momentum by Sun, after that it just keeps rolling in the industry and apparently, there's no stopping that. Python also has its momentum from the academia, what with all the great libraries and all. But one would expect to see some _major_ projects done entirely in LISP (and not a Trojan Horse LISP like Clojure), after that, it's only a matter of time for developers to become LISPers.
Of course, one could also claim that LISP actually _did_ have like half a century to prove itself, or gain momentum. After all, Golang and ruby are relatively new, but they eat LISP's lunch at launch of new apps.
I really appreciate things like this project. It's not enough, but what is?
Re: Dinosaur and Lisp
#9Apart from Clojure (which is not LISP, really), I haven't seen end-user applications written in LISP dialects (I don't think emacs is end-user software). Scheme (and its PLT dialect Racket) was in academia for so long that it literally got "friend-zoned" and has little (read "no") use in the industry. Then again, I expected to see more Common LISP around. Paul Graham really put it right, but I guess any leverage/adva…
Would Autocad qualify?