Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
1–10 of 15 posts
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#2can we please stop letting these hit the front page until people write reasoned articled free from the obvious bias that makes them resemble playground arguments.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#3can we please stop letting these hit the front page until people write reasoned articled free from the obvious bias that makes them resemble playground arguments.
Does such an article exist? I actually prefer these debates because they don't pretend to be unbiased. They put their cards on the table.
If someone seems unbiased it just means it hid the bias well, but achieved the same result.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#4can we please stop letting these hit the front page until people write reasoned articled free from the obvious bias that makes them resemble playground arguments.
Does such an article exist? I actually prefer these debates because they don't pretend to be unbiased. They put their cards on the table. If someone seems unbiased it just means it hid the bias well, but achieved the same result.
Here's the thing. They don't put their cards on the table. They just bicker, going tit for tat on every little argument. There is far too little science being discussed.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#5Earlier quoted context omitted.
Does such an article exist? I actually prefer these debates because they don't pretend to be unbiased. They put their cards on the table. If someone seems unbiased it just means it hid the bias well, but achieved the same result.
Here's the thing. They don't put their cards on the table. They just bicker, going tit for tat on every little argument. There is far too little science being discussed.
Couldn't agree more.
We need case studies and proposed solutions from both camps, putting them to real tests.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#6You can skip the article and just read this sentence:
"Digg solved their very real I/O issue by essentially pre-caching every possible query result for a targeted need."
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#7can we please stop letting these hit the front page until people write reasoned articled free from the obvious bias that makes them resemble playground arguments.
This flamewar is getting tedious
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#8Dennis Forbes really seems like the much more rational debater in this exchange.
I do like reading the back and forth. They both make good points, and this is an argument with real applicability to help us decide what tech to be using in the future.
The widespread adoption of cheap SSDs and super fast IO performance is going to be a huge difference maker.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#9If anyone is curious about some real-world data with lots of specific details, Linden Lab published tons of details around their most recent MySQL update here: https://blogs.secondlife.com/community/technology/blog/2010/...
Short version is that currently primary MySQL server now peaks at 11,500 queries per second.
Re: Dennis Forbes Responds to Joe Stump on the NoSQL Debate
#10I couldn't get past the ALL CAPS RESPONSES THAT ARE ALSO BOLDED. Gimme a break, it's not that serious.