BSD vs. Linux (2005)
over-yonder.net
BSD vs. Linux (2005)
1–10 of 371 posts
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#2In the meantime FreeBSD has changed the release schedule and there are efforts under way to package the base system separately.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#3Ok fair enough, but the same can be said about manual v automatic transmissions, static versus interpreted languages, etc.
When something is harder to use then you're forced to think about it more and understand it better.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#4This is probably the best comparison of [Free]BSD and Linux, if a bit dated. In the meantime FreeBSD has changed the release schedule and there are efforts under way to package the base system separately.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#5I like using Linux, but I still miss the predictability of a BSD system - you know where things are, and where they are supposed to be. When I first started using Linux, I was absolutely flummoxed by the lack of distinction between the base system and add-on utilities.
Linux definitely feels more "organic" and "grown" whereas FreeBSD seems like it was architected and planned out. Not that this is a bad thing for Linux. My FreeBSD heritage still shines through when I use Linux; anything I install from source sits in /usr/local :).
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#6> It's been my impression that the BSD communit{y,ies}, in general, understand Linux far better than the Linux communit{y,ies} understand BSD. Ok fair enough, but the same can be said about manual v automatic transmissions, static versus interpreted languages, etc. When something is harder to use then you're forced to think about it more and understand it better.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#7> It's been my impression that the BSD communit{y,ies}, in general, understand Linux far better than the Linux communit{y,ies} understand BSD. Ok fair enough, but the same can be said about manual v automatic transmissions, static versus interpreted languages, etc. When something is harder to use then you're forced to think about it more and understand it better.
A consistently designed well-documented system is probably easier to use, all else being equal.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#8https://www.nginx.com/blog/why-netflix-chose-nginx-as-the-he...
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#9> It's been my impression that the BSD communit{y,ies}, in general, understand Linux far better than the Linux communit{y,ies} understand BSD. Ok fair enough, but the same can be said about manual v automatic transmissions, static versus interpreted languages, etc. When something is harder to use then you're forced to think about it more and understand it better.
Re: BSD vs. Linux (2005)
#10I run Ubuntu now on multiple devices. It often has a feel of flimsy binary patches. I don't know that I care too much though as it works well. I have family members too on it so it is good to remain practiced with it to help them.
I miss playing with FreeBSD though! Perhaps I should run it on one of my RPis? Anyway, this is a great site.