Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
stallman.org
Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
1–10 of 376 posts
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#2Can any one point out when was this article written ?
He has some really valid points in there.
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#3[deleted]
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#4Can any one point out when was this article written ? He has some really valid points in there.
No idea when it was created (probably early in Facebook's existence), but Stallman has people constantly update and add new stuff.
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#5Can any one point out when was this article written ? He has some really valid points in there.
> Copyright 2011-2013 Richard Stallman released under Creative Commons Attribution Noderivs 3.0 unported
2011 I guess
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#6I turned off ublock so that I could load the stylesheet. Nope, stallman's site just looks like that. It's actually refreshing, just a radical departure from the status quo. Although, it is RMS so should've expected that...
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#7I couldn't help but cringe every time the word "used" was used for "user" after the first occurence.
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#8[deleted]
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#9Can any one point out when was this article written ? He has some really valid points in there.
This gives a rough estimate.
https://web.archive.org/web/20110915000000*/https://stallman...
Re: Reasons not to use (i.e., be used by) Facebook
#10Can any one point out when was this article written ? He has some really valid points in there.
2011, but it has been constantly updated since: https://web.archive.org/web/*/https://stallman.org/facebook....