Live data from Hacker News

Emacs and Screen

emacsen.livejournal.com

1–10 of 17 posts

Re: Emacs and Screen

#2
This doesn't solve one problem that sends me running to nano a lot: having very old Emacs versions (usually 21) on the server that don't work with my configuration.

Re: Emacs and Screen

#4
post #2

This doesn't solve one problem that sends me running to nano a lot: having very old Emacs versions (usually 21) on the server that don't work with my configuration.

You could always install a recent version of Emacs yourself even if you're not an admin, can't you? Also, don't forget the options for remote editing.

Re: Emacs and Screen

#6
Don't do this. Instead, start emacs. Run M-x server-start. Now to edit a file, just say "emacsclient -t filename". You are instantly connected to your running emacs session, in the terminal you are currently working in. You can have an arbitrary number of these. C-x C-c closes the instance you are working in, not every instance.

I just run "emacs --daemon" when I log in, "emacsclient -c" to get my main emacs X frame, and then "emacsclient -t foo.bar" when I need to edit something. (Actually, I alias "emacsclient -t" to "ec", so "ec foo.bar".)

If you don't want to install Emacs for some reason, "mg" is a much better choice than vi or nano.

Re: Emacs and Screen

#9
post #8
post #7

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's just silly. mg is much nicer. http://packages.debian.org/sid/mg

According to what criteria?

That it works more like Emacs than Vi, which is an advantage to someone who uses Emacs "for long haul editing".
Post reply on HN