X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
phoronix.com
X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
1–10 of 91 posts
Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#2Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#3https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/help/dndr/udrp-en
edit: according to a verisign employee I know, it costs ~1000-2000USD to do the dispute process but if they have the trademark and it's not being challenged (go to trial) it just gets reviewed at meeting and people vote.
Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#4Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#5They're not losing it because of some legal battle or copyright claim, they're losing it because they lost contact with the guy who really owns it, and waited until they had one week to go to make the issue public.
They deserve to lose it either way.
Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#6They're not losing it because of some legal battle or copyright claim, they're losing it because they lost contact with the guy who really owns it, and waited until they had one week to go to make the issue public.
Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#7Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#8Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#9They're not losing it because of some legal battle or copyright claim, they're losing it because they lost contact with the guy who really owns it, and waited until they had one week to go to make the issue public.
So they're losing it because either they don't care or they're incompetent. They deserve to lose it either way.
> Apparently for the past half-year there have been some "ownership struggles" of the X.Org domain name, which the X.Org Foundation Board of Directors have been trying to resolve in private.
Re: X.Org Might Lose Its Domain Name
#10They're not losing it because of some legal battle or copyright claim, they're losing it because they lost contact with the guy who really owns it, and waited until they had one week to go to make the issue public.
There are provisions in place for replacing contacts on registered domains when the contact is someone no longer with an organization, and I'm pretty sure those aren't generally all that onerous (since incorrect changes can be reverted) - generally something on organization letterhead, probably a drivers' license photo, that kind of thing. In this case because the originally registering organization no longer exists they basically need proof that either the current foundation is legally the successor entity or they need proof that the domain name was part of the "assets" transferred to the new 501(c)3. They could probably have just sent in a change request on the current letterhead, but I suspect that A) they're no longer at that address either, B) Someone at Verisign said "Hey.... If we force an expiration we can auction this sucker for $$$$$$", or C) Leon Shiman could be expected to object to a change.
Another problem is the question of whether there's a registered trademark for X.Org - if they had that, even if someone else snagged the domain I suspect they'd be able to get it back via UDRP. Unfortunately it's not clear from a quick search that it's ever been trademarked, which likely drastically complicates the situation.