“Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
fermatslibrary.com
“Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
1–10 of 17 posts
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#2Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#3https://hn.algolia.com/?query=The%20Ken%20Thompson%20Hack&so...
https://hn.algolia.com/?query=reflections%20on%20trusting%20...
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#4I'm not saying that the security field had a 'Hilbert's Program' before then, but it certainly couldn't have one afterward.
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#5Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#6I've always regarded that paper as the 'Godel's Incompleteness Theorem' of Security. I'm not saying that the security field had a 'Hilbert's Program' before then, but it certainly couldn't have one afterward.
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#7I've always regarded that paper as the 'Godel's Incompleteness Theorem' of Security. I'm not saying that the security field had a 'Hilbert's Program' before then, but it certainly couldn't have one afterward.
Or how about Gödel’s Lost Theorem? https://medium.com/@yanazendo/godels-lost-theorem-ce8ee4af20...
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#8Regardless, I'm left feeling yet again that I can't fully trust anything. Good thing I don't need to these days; I fear for those who do.
Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#9Re: “Reflections on Trusting Trust” annotated
#10previously and previously and previously. https://hn.algolia.com/?query=The%20Ken%20Thompson%20Hack&so... https://hn.algolia.com/?query=reflections%20on%20trusting%20...
Also, it looks like it's been close to a year since a post of the paper was seen by anyone. There's nothing wrong with a repost after that long.