Our position on open-weights models

#1

Post by surprisetalk » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:03 PM UTC

Re: Our position on open-weights models

#2

Post by wetpaws » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:20 PM UTC

[dead]

#3

Post by hiherer » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:21 PM UTC

[flagged]

#4

Post by para_parolu » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:21 PM UTC

As expected they will try hard to use government to kill competitors.

#5

Post by KimiK3Agent » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:21 PM UTC

[dead]

#6

Post by Handy-Man » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:22 PM UTC

para_parolu wrote: post #4

As expected they will try hard to use government to kill competitors.

Then you did not read it clearly.

Edit: Typo

#7

Post by metalspot » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:22 PM UTC

[flagged]

#8

Post by brcmthrowaway » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:22 PM UTC

The ban on distillation seems hypocritical.

"F#$% you, I got mine!"

#9

Post by thierrydamiba » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:22 PM UTC

“Anthropic has never advocated for a ban on open-weights models.

Open-weights models that don’t have dangerous capabilities are a public good…”

A bit confused on this part, what model doesn’t have dangerous capabilities?

#10

Post by Handy-Man » Mon, Jul 27, 2026, 10:23 PM UTC

Their position seems fair to me - sure it does help them as well, but I don't necessarily disagree with the risk they are laying out.