Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#2Imagine a whole generation of teens with attention spans longer than 15 seconds…they might actually realize their incredible potential!
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#3Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#4....
But then also global measures?
> Teen account holders under 18 everywhere will get a version of Reddit with more protective safety features built in, including stricter chat settings, no ads personalization or sensitive ads, and no access to NSFW or mature content.
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#5Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#6As kids find alternative platforms, perhaps they will be vendor locked to them instead of the Meta empire.
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#7Awesome. I hope they do the same in Europe. Children should not be addicted to TikTok.
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#8Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#9>the days leading to the ban, some teenagers said that they were prompted to verify their ages using a facial analysis feature, but that it gave inaccurate estimates. The law also states that companies cannot ask users to provide government-issued identification as the only way to prove their age because of privacy concerns.
Re: Australia begins enforcing world-first teen social media ban
#10How does a country effectively enforce this? Below is how they propose doing this. If you don't have any form of verification of your actual age, it's seems like they are just going on what the user says ( self reports). How can a company be found liable if a used lies about their age? >the days leading to the ban, some teenagers said that they were prompted to verify their ages using a facial analysis feature, but t…
You make them bleed money when you find they are in violation. They either figure it out or they go under as a company. There isn't a natural law saying companies have a right to exist.