OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
1–10 of 1001 posts
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#2Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#3Ironic, OpenAI claiming someone else stole their work.
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#4How would they prove they used it’s model. I would be curious to know their methodology. Also what legal actions OpenAI can take? can DeepSeek be banned in US?
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#5[flagged]
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#6The subtitle is the gold... : "White House AI tsar David Sacks raises possibility of alleged intellectual property theft"
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#7So what? They probably paid for api access just like everyone else. So it's a TOS violation at worst. Go ahead, open a civil suit in the US against an entity the US courts do not have jurisdiction over and quit whining...
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#8What's good for the goose is good for the gander. Obviously a transformative work and not an intellectual property violation any more than OpenAI injesting every piece of media in existence.
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#9I quite like a scenery where llm output can't be copyrighted, so that it is possible to eventually train a llm with data from the previous one(s)
Re: OpenAI says it has evidence DeepSeek used its model to train competitor
#10I quite like a scenery where llm output can't be copyrighted, so that it is possible to eventually train a llm with data from the previous one(s)
OpenAI argues it’s a violation of their terms of service. So there are legal issues if it can be proven.