Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
1–7 of 7 posts
Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#2Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#3Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#4Man I love graph abstractions and database, but the inevitable questions comes - why HBase? Why not use a database that isn't nearly impossible to set up?
Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#5Confusing as there is already a successful software named Haystack.
Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#6Man I love graph abstractions and database, but the inevitable questions comes - why HBase? Why not use a database that isn't nearly impossible to set up?
The primary motive for writing this was the fact that Hbase gives a fairly cheap(hdfs) backend storage and near linear scalability. Also most of the schema is encoded in row keys in such a way that hbase prefix scans can be leveraged to serve traversals across billions of nodes/edges.
Re: Show HN: Haystack – Simple graph abstraction over Hbase
#7Earlier quoted context omitted.
The primary motive for writing this was the fact that Hbase gives a fairly cheap(hdfs) backend storage and near linear scalability. Also most of the schema is encoded in row keys in such a way that hbase prefix scans can be leveraged to serve traversals across billions of nodes/edges.
Cheap in only the most puerile sense - the complexity and availability foists a particular cost on HBase that is just too high for most people.
Although theoretically this abstraction can live on top of any backend which has facilities for fast prefix scans.