Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
#2Re: Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
#3The entire thing can be built for around ~$35-40.
Here's our parts list: - Raspberry pi 2w for its low power draw, wifi capabilities, decent memory (512mb), and low cost ($15). Also with a arducam - Cheap TTL Aliexpress thermal printer along with sticker thermal paper - Rotary encoder for switching modes, push button for our shutter, and tactile switch for our power switch - I2C OLED display for display our modes and settings - 2 18650 batteries and a 3amp 5v UPS supply, enabling good battery life and regulation. We also add a 1000uF capacity to guard against current spikes from the printer.
We have a longer write up on our devpost: https://devpost.com/software/diffuji?ref_content=user-portfo...
We submitted this for Treehacks 2026, and ended up winning the Most Creative grand prize :)
Re: Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
#4Cool idea, but kinda sad that it has to go through a cloud-provider. I feel like there's a possibility with an accelerator-board (Coral TPU or something), to make this into a totally local thing maybe? The longer-waiting time is surely not an issue when considering how many people still use Polaroids.
Alternatively we could use compute from your iPhone, but it adds additional dependencies to external hardware that I don't quite like. We could use a Jetson, but then power draw is quite high. I agree with you that on-device inference is the holy grail, but figuring out the best approach is something we are still trying to figure out.
Re: Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
#5Re: Show HN: Diffuji – a diffusion-powered instant camera
#6Cool idea, but kinda sad that it has to go through a cloud-provider. I feel like there's a possibility with an accelerator-board (Coral TPU or something), to make this into a totally local thing maybe? The longer-waiting time is surely not an issue when considering how many people still use Polaroids.