Show HN: Solving the 5000W Compute Wall in Physics AI via Algebraic Continuity
1–5 of 5 posts
Re: Show HN: Solving the 5000W Compute Wall in Physics AI via Algebraic Continuity
#2Re: Show HN: Solving the 5000W Compute Wall in Physics AI via Algebraic Continuity
#3> To prevent "tunneling" (objects passing through each other) in high-dynamic scenes, developers are forced to infinitely shrink the time-step (Δt).
Surely this was avoided from decades ago by analytical solving.
Re: Show HN: Solving the 5000W Compute Wall in Physics AI via Algebraic Continuity
#4> The Over-sampling Crisis (Computational Waste): > To prevent "tunneling" (objects passing through each other) in high-dynamic scenes, developers are forced to infinitely shrink the time-step (Δt). Surely this was avoided from decades ago by analytical solving.
Re: Show HN: Solving the 5000W Compute Wall in Physics AI via Algebraic Continuity
#5> The Over-sampling Crisis (Computational Waste): > To prevent "tunneling" (objects passing through each other) in high-dynamic scenes, developers are forced to infinitely shrink the time-step (Δt). Surely this was avoided from decades ago by analytical solving.
You are referring to Continuous Collision Detection (CCD), which has indeed existed for decades. However, CCD is a detection patch, not an integrator cure. 1. The Scaling Wall: While CCD avoids tunneling for a single pair of objects, solving it analytically for a system with thousands of constraints leads to a Non-linear Complementarity Problem (NCP) explosion. Most engines fallback to iterative solvers (like PGS or…