Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
1–10 of 32 posts
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#2How many of my TL;DR points here https://www.earth.org.uk/RSS-efficiency.html do you already deal with, out of interest?
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#3How many of my TL;DR points here https://www.earth.org.uk/RSS-efficiency.html do you already deal with, out of interest?
2 and 3 so far, but I am planning to support the others as well, thanks.
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#4How does this compare to newsboat?
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#5How does this compare to newsboat?
[flagged]
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#6How does this compare to newsboat?
[deleted]
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#7Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#8Looks nice. But I'ts strange that there are so many "simple" feedreaders. Where are the tools for powerusers? How many feeds and formats are people using usually to be satisfied with simple?
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#9How many of my TL;DR points here https://www.earth.org.uk/RSS-efficiency.html do you already deal with, out of interest?
Not that I disagree with this for any HTTP service, but how big of an issue is the network/compute power for RSS?
Seems like a minor payload to be delivered. I guess it makes a difference in the performance/UX of the reader itself.
Re: Show HN: Cleed – Simple feed reader for the command line
#10Looks nice. But I'ts strange that there are so many "simple" feedreaders. Where are the tools for powerusers? How many feeds and formats are people using usually to be satisfied with simple?
What poweruser tools are you missing in newsboat?