Would love to get some feedback.
Show HN: Aft, minimalistic file transferring program
github.com
1–10 of 13 posts
Would love to get some feedback.
Show HN: Aft, minimalistic file transferring program
github.com
What's the difference between it and sftp?
The user probably shouldn’t need to think about whether it’s in p2p mode or not.
There’s already the excellent [croc]( https://github.com/schollz/croc ) which I’ve gotten all my friends to install and use.
Also, some people might like Rust more than Go ;)
there's also magic wormhole which seems to do something very similar? https://github.com/magic-wormhole/magic-wormhole
Each program has it's unique benefits, Magic Wormhole looks great, but I do believe that aft gives you more configuration by default, and its more accessible to you.
Also, some people like Rust more than Python ;)
Edit: typo
Feedback: having to specify addresses and ports is a drag. I suggest looking at how magic wormhole does it; nobody wants to look up and type in IP addresses. The user probably shouldn’t need to think about whether it’s in p2p mode or not.
> The user probably shouldn’t need to think about whether it’s in p2p mode or not.
aft designs to be configurable, but I do believe your comment is right and something about it in the docs should be added. There is also a config file in this program, with a default `mode` property. It's not really used right now, but very soon it will be.
There’s already the excellent [croc]( https://github.com/schollz/croc ) which I’ve gotten all my friends to install and use.
It sure looks excellent, `aft` actually looks very similar to it with the same relay server idea. I don't know the program, but from a first glance, it looks like it requires a relay server. While I don't think it has any major disadvantages, but needing to communicate with an external service might not be reasonable for some people. And many times you might not require a relay server at all such as transferring on a…
Why would this matter for users?