Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
1–6 of 6 posts
Re: Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
#2_synergisticvelocity_. brilliant.
we used to play a game at work where you could accrue points by using corporate buzzwords during meetings. highly recommended
Re: Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
#3I'm sure many thought of this, many ways to do it as well, cross repo or a dedicated one just for that. I wonder what github thinks of this.
Re: Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
#4I'm sure many thought of this, many ways to do it as well, cross repo or a dedicated one just for that. I wonder what github thinks of this.
Most definitely - I'm sure there's at least dozens of implementations of the idea you can find just by googling.
I wrote it because I'd directly seen or heard colleagues complain of real proposals to use git KPI as serious, primary perf measures for ICs. Linking to the satirical example of why poor measures result in poor outcomes can be a pretty effective tool for resolving the discussion to a good place ;).
This was a fun project to figure out and frame with the readme copy.
From the GH perspective I'm guessing they run some offline batch aggregation jobs to roll these stats based on the 24h timeframe. I capped the total commits to an arbitrary but polite # to avoid DoSing their stats pipeline after skimming ToS and seeing nothing that said - don't do this. It appears that they do monitor for excessive usage and care more about large objects than many commits: https://docs.github.com/en/github/site-policy/github-accepta...
Re: Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
#5I'm sure many thought of this, many ways to do it as well, cross repo or a dedicated one just for that. I wonder what github thinks of this.
Most definitely - I'm sure there's at least dozens of implementations of the idea you can find just by googling. I wrote it because I'd directly seen or heard colleagues complain of real proposals to use git KPI as serious, primary perf measures for ICs. Linking to the satirical example of why poor measures result in poor outcomes can be a pretty effective tool for resolving the discussion to a good place ;). This wa…
Your question @proc0 did make me think more about the value I've gotten from GH vs. what I've given back - I've signed up for the annual subscription plan as a result of that thought process.
Re: Show HN: Generate Arbitrary GitHub Activity
#6Earlier quoted context omitted.
Most definitely - I'm sure there's at least dozens of implementations of the idea you can find just by googling. I wrote it because I'd directly seen or heard colleagues complain of real proposals to use git KPI as serious, primary perf measures for ICs. Linking to the satirical example of why poor measures result in poor outcomes can be a pretty effective tool for resolving the discussion to a good place ;). This wa…
Your question @proc0 did make me think more about the value I've gotten from GH vs. what I've given back - I've signed up for the annual subscription plan as a result of that thought process.
I was thinking that this could be a metric which is given too much importance imho, since it can be hacked, but not necessarily with a script. Deliberately making smaller or redundant commits achieves something similar. Of course a script is at least fun and also good practice.