Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
searchablepdfs.org
Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#2Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#3Thoughts?
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#4What's the privacy model? While the PDFs are deleted, what happens to the searchable content? Is it also deleted?
What's the revenue model? How can we be sure it'll be around in a few months?
Is there an AJAX interface?
Is the quality or performance better than running Tesseract on a server?
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#5Is this based on an open-source OCR engine, a proprietary engine running on your own server(s), or a proprietary engine you're accessing as a service?
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#6Is this better than https://ocr.space ?
For my private documents I would always use offline OCR software like http://blog.a9t9.com/p/free-ocr-software.html
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#7Don't know it the OCR function is available in the reader version.
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#8Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#9Is this based on an open-source OCR engine, a proprietary engine running on your own server(s), or a proprietary engine you're accessing as a service?
Given that the OCR'ed PDFs use the "GlyphLessFont" font, it seems that tesseract [1] is used. [1] https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
What the OCR market needs is someone who will bring that level of OCR quality - or better - to the masses (perhaps some deep learning grad student with time to kill?), not yet another wrapper around Tesseract. We have those already!
Re: Show HN: Convert scanned documents into searchable PDFs
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that the OCR'ed PDFs use the "GlyphLessFont" font, it seems that tesseract [1] is used. [1] https://github.com/tesseract-ocr/tesseract
I hope not. Tesseract delivers bad results on high quality scans, far below the same OCR quality achieved by services like Google Books. What the OCR market needs is someone who will bring that level of OCR quality - or better - to the masses (perhaps some deep learning grad student with time to kill?), not yet another wrapper around Tesseract. We have those already!