Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
1–10 of 28 posts
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#2Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#3Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#4Which PostgreSQL features new in 9.5 are being used that cause that? Or are earlier versions somehow buggy?
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#5Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#6It's interesting that it says that "Warning: Requires Postgres 9.5. You WILL lose sync if you run against an earlier version. YOU HAVE BEEN WARNED." Which PostgreSQL features new in 9.5 are being used that cause that? Or are earlier versions somehow buggy?
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#7How would this prevent a flood attack ? What I mean is in Bitcoin and presumably Stellar, you need coins to create transactions. There is therefore a cost to spamming the system.
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#8Basically, `Bitcoin - Politics`. A nice idea.
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#9How would you deal with DDoS attacks? Taking down a ledger like this could be easy...
Re: Show HN: My experimental take on a decentralized ledger
#10> Transactions are FREE (the fee is always zero) How would you deal with DDoS attacks? Taking down a ledger like this could be easy...
That's the open question.