Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
1–10 of 22 posts
Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#2Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#3Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#4Happy to answer any questions, this has been a little side project of mine with Swift and Google's Gmail API.
Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#5Happy to answer any questions, this has been a little side project of mine with Swift and Google's Gmail API.
Why in-app purchase instead of just making the app $5?? This is akin to a demo version and it's a bit misleading to call it Free.
As to why in-app purchase, I wanted people to be able to use it first without payment. In-app purchase has been growing in popularity on the App Stores lately and I think this is why. I also feel it's cleaner not to have two separate versions on the App Store.
But thanks for the feedback, I guess you're right. It's misleading to call it free. I will amend the landing page to make it clearer.
Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#6Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#7Happy to answer any questions, this has been a little side project of mine with Swift and Google's Gmail API.
Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#8Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#9I currently use Checker Plus for Gmail Chrome extension: https://chrome.google.com/webstore/detail/checker-plus-for-g.... Does the job very well.
Re: Show HN: Aura, Native OS X Notifications for Gmail and Google Apps
#10Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why in-app purchase instead of just making the app $5?? This is akin to a demo version and it's a bit misleading to call it Free.
My reasoning was that most people only have one email account and thus would be fine with the free version. As to why in-app purchase, I wanted people to be able to use it first without payment. In-app purchase has been growing in popularity on the App Stores lately and I think this is why. I also feel it's cleaner not to have two separate versions on the App Store. But thanks for the feedback, I guess you're right.…