looks vibe coded
Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
91–100 of 130 posts
Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#92Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Hehe ditto I get flak for this, but Audacity is my "proof" that GIMP's name is why people don't use it, not the UI. Like GIMP, Audacity's UI is awful, but people still use it. :)
people use gimp too. and i bet there are more gimp users than audacity. as for the UI, i don't get it. what's so bad about it? and how is this one better? i looked at both and ardour too. so far audacity is the only one that has a feature to detect silence and label it. it's pretty easy to use too. i use this to detect chapters and create a chapter index for audio books. last one i did this week took only a few minut…
Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#94Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#95So want something like this but where the tracks are in the cloud. I want to "check out" someone's drum loop and add a guitar riff. Check it into a branch. Someone else checks out the drum+guitar, adds a bass line. Checks in. "Jamming" with other people is one of the most fun things. To the degree that you can "get close" on the web… RiffHub, anyone?
Idk if the GitHub analogy really works for music. With software, the code is a tool. And you can give the code away and still make money on hosting, support, enterprise sales, consulting, recruiting, whatever. With music, the stem is the product. If the drum loop is mediocre, nobody cares. If it's actually good, the creator usually wants ownership, licensing, royalties, exclusivity, or at minimum, attribution. But ev…
Also I don't get the impression the idea is intended for "most musicians".
Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#96Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#97Cool work, the weird part is effects being item based instead of track based and that selecting an effect stops the playing and you apply it blind.
Thanks for your comment :) you can press "preview" (and there is a little on/off) in the effect's modal window. But I agree with you, an automation type system that operates on the entire track might be better
Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#98Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#99So want something like this but where the tracks are in the cloud. I want to "check out" someone's drum loop and add a guitar riff. Check it into a branch. Someone else checks out the drum+guitar, adds a bass line. Checks in. "Jamming" with other people is one of the most fun things. To the degree that you can "get close" on the web… RiffHub, anyone?
If that's just "turn-based collaboration" use the same DAW and a shared Drive/Dropbox/Whatever.
Re: Show HN: Audiomass – a free, open-source multitrack audio editor for the web
#100Hey HN. Thanks again for featuring this project :) this is my favorite community on the internet and my go to site to visit, almost by reflex, when I have idle time, so it feels me with joy to have made something well received here. I 'll be heading off soon, so decided to write some features included in this release that might not be apparent right away (still working on improving the UX). - Drag n drop multiple aud…