[flagged]
Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
91–100 of 140 posts
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#92The title of this post doesn't match the repo at all
if you want the wiki only, install WUPHF and only use the wiki layer. the promotion flow, fact log, and /lookup work without the multi-agent office around them.
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#93I don't understand the point of automating note taking. It never worked for me to copy paste text into my notes and now you can 100x that? The whole point of taking notes for me is to read a source critically, fit it in my mental model, and then document that. Then sometimes I look it up for the details. But for me the shaping of the mental model is what counts
I think there‘s a serious issue with people using AI to do an immense amount of busywork and then never look at it again. Colossal waste.
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#94Reviewed: https://zby.github.io/commonplace/agent-memory-systems/revie... It is a third llm wiki on front page in 24 hours! Obviously it is a hot topic. I have my own horse in that race - so I might not be objective - but I've compiled a wishlist for these system: https://zby.github.io/commonplace/notes/designing-agent-memo... I wish there was a chance for collaboration - everybody coding their own system seems like…
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#95Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#96Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#97I don't understand the point of automating note taking. It never worked for me to copy paste text into my notes and now you can 100x that? The whole point of taking notes for me is to read a source critically, fit it in my mental model, and then document that. Then sometimes I look it up for the details. But for me the shaping of the mental model is what counts
I've been coding like this lately: if I'm too lazy to review a new non-critical section/unit tests, I'll mark it as `// SLOP`; later, if I have to, I'll go through the entire thing, and unmark
shitty tests are better than no tests, as long as you your expectations are low enough
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#98I don't understand the point of automating note taking. It never worked for me to copy paste text into my notes and now you can 100x that? The whole point of taking notes for me is to read a source critically, fit it in my mental model, and then document that. Then sometimes I look it up for the details. But for me the shaping of the mental model is what counts
The few scientific studies out there actually show a degradation of output quality when these markdown collections are fully LLM maintained (opposed to an increase when they’re human maintained), which I found fascinating. I think the sweet spot is human curation of these documents, but unsupervised management is never the answer, especially if you don’t consciously think about debt / drift in these.
Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#99Re: Show HN: A Karpathy-style LLM wiki your agents maintain (Markdown and Git)
#100Cool idea. But is anyone actually building real stuff like this with any kind of high quality? Every time I hear someone say "I have a team of agents", what I hear is "I'm shipping heaps of AI slop".
the team is of 4 HubSpotters who built HubSpot's largest platforms - search, nav, notifs, permissions, AI.
we are in the process of opening up large pieces of our enterprise context architecture to WUPHF and also ship the cloud enterprise version of WUPHF (https://nex.ai/new-home).