Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

github.com

91–100 of 108 posts

Re: Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

#93
I built something in a similar space: Linko (https://github.com/monsterxx03/linko), a transparent MITM proxy with a webui that lets you see what's actually being sent between Claude Code and LLM APIs in real time.

  It's been really helpful for me to debug my own sessions and understand what the model is seeing (system prompts, tool definitions, tracing tool calls etc.).

Re: Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

#94
The "no meaningful benchmark for good agentic session performance" point resonates. Success varies so much by task type that a single metric is almost meaningless. A 60-second documentation lookup and a 30-minute refactoring session could both be successes.

Curious what shape the benchmark takes. Are you thinking per-task-type baselines, or something more like an aggregate efficiency score?

Re: Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

#95
post #53

[flagged]

It's crazy how fast I'm able to identify these bots now. You just get an uncanny valley type of feeling immediately reading it. Sure enough you click the profile and it's a brand new account with one or two similar posts in the same style. There's some sort of writing style here that identifies it because I've picked upon it multiple times quickly but it's hard to articulate into words.

[flagged]

Re: Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

#96
post #53

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It's crazy how fast I'm able to identify these bots now. You just get an uncanny valley type of feeling immediately reading it. Sure enough you click the profile and it's a brand new account with one or two similar posts in the same style. There's some sort of writing style here that identifies it because I've picked upon it multiple times quickly but it's hard to articulate into words.

[flagged]

[flagged]

Re: Show HN: Rudel – Claude Code Session Analytics

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

[flagged]

[flagged]

No, LLMs often have an identifiable style that can be unpleasant to read. I came here after identifying your account as a bot, but it looks like that's not true. I would rather read whatever English you are able to write. If it's not enough for you to communicate, it would be better to just use a traditional machine translator, such as https://libretranslate.com/
Post reply on HN