91–100 of 141 posts
I like the idea here, but the final product is just so far from what good interactive articles/explanations actually look like. E.g., this style of article: - https://mlu-explain.github.io/decision-tree/ - any article from distill.pub - any piece from NYT
100 papers processed.
Cost breakdown:
LLM cost $64
AWS cost $0.0003
Claude's editorial comment about this breakdown, "For context, the Anthropic API cost ($63.32) is roughly 200,000x the AWS infrastructure cost. The AWS bill is a rounding error compared to the LLM spend."
Category breakdown:
Computer and Information Sciences 41%
Biological and Biomedical Sciences 15%
Health Sciences 7%
Mathematics and Statistics 5%
Geosciences, Atmospheric, and Ocean Sciences 5%
Physical Sciences 5%
Other 22%
There were a handful of errors due to papers >100 pages. If there were others, I didn't see them (but please let me know).
I'd be interested in hearing from people, what's one thing you would change/add/remove from this app?
I’d love if this can be self-hosted, but i understand you may want to monetize it. I’ll keep checking back.
In some other apps, I've toyed around with charging for code access. Basically, a flat rate gets you into to the repo. Would that interest you? Personally, I hate subscription pricing and think we need more innovation in pricing models.
Is this that?
Some ideas for seeing more examples: 1. Add a donate button. Some folks probably just want to see more examples (or an example in their field, but don't have a specific paper in mind.) 2. Have a way to nominate papers to be examples. You could do this in the HN thread without any product changes. This could give good coverage of different fields and uncover weaknesses in the product.
Really clever ideas! Maybe a combo where I keep a list and automatically process as funds become available.