Earlier quoted context omitted.
I wish that were true. Models don't feel like they've really had massive leaps. They do get better, but not enough to change any of the configuration I have. But you are correct, there is a real possibility that the time invested with be obsolete at some point. For sure the work towards MCPs are basically obsolete via skills. These things happen.
i don't understand this mcp/skill distinction? one of the mcps i use indexes the runtime dependency of code modules so that claude can refactor without just blindly grepping. how would that be a "skill"? just wrap the mcp in a cli? fwiw this may be a skill issue, pun intended, but i can't seem to get claude to trigger skills, whereas it reaches for mcps more... i wonder if im missing something. I'm plenty productive…
So a Skill is just a smaller granulatrity level of that concept. It's just one of the individual things an MCP can do.
This is about context management at some level. When you need to do a single thing within that full list of potential things, you don't need the instructions about a ton of other unrelated things in the context.
So it's just not that deep. It would be having a python script or whatever that the skill calls that returns the runtime dependencies and gives them back to the LLM so they can refactor without blindly greping.
Does that make sense?