Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

onlyrecipeapp.com

91–100 of 161 posts

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#91

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That works for some recipes, but for bread precise is better. I'm astonished when I read bread recipes that casually ask for 2 cups of flour (which could be wildly different amounts).

Looking through your comments, your spelling indicates you might be from a Commonwealth country, which means you might not be familiar with the fact that a "cup" is a standardized measurement in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_(unit)#Customary_cup

Sure, but in practice people don't use measuring cups all that precisely a lot of the time. Specifying a weight forces people to bust out the scale and pay attention.

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#92
post #48

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I have a scale in my kitchen that measures with 0.1g precision, and it doesn't do what you describe (change while you're not touching it). Perhaps technology has advanced since the anecdote you describe? Or maybe my scale is just lying to me.

Hmmm then I bet it was a flaw. Or maybe modern scales have microcontrollers that adjust for this? This was a scale in a jeweler in India. It might have been in the late 80s or mid-90s. I might be misremembering too. So take my anecdote with a grain of salt.

> So take my anecdote with a grain of salt.

Oh, come on. Surely the scale wasn't that precise.

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#93
post #85

Earlier quoted context omitted.

"Also, depending on the ingredient, it makes more sense to use cups as a measurement of volume, not mass, when converting to metric." Hmmm... What kind of cup? :-) US "legal" cup (240ml) US customary cup (246,6ml) metric cup (250ml) UK cup (170,5ml) edit: fixed typo 150ml -> 250ml

Not sure where that 150ml came from - our metric country (New Zealand) 1 cup is 250 ml.

Thanks, I mistyped. I meant 250 ml.

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#94

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That works for some recipes, but for bread precise is better. I'm astonished when I read bread recipes that casually ask for 2 cups of flour (which could be wildly different amounts).

Looking through your comments, your spelling indicates you might be from a Commonwealth country, which means you might not be familiar with the fact that a "cup" is a standardized measurement in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_(unit)#Customary_cup

Yes but it's a measure of _volume_, whereas flour is best measured by _weight_. Any volume measurement of flour can vary wildly depending on many factors, such as how densely packed it is.

King Arthur Flour have a short video[0] demonstrating the wildly different weight measurements from measuring a "cup" (the same cup size across samples).

Measuring liquids by volume is totally fine because you generally won't get a large difference between two different cups of water (although I still generally measure that by weight as a personal preference).

[0] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GUSovVHpqsU

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#95
post #72

This is great, but it seems to be missing the requisite 5000 word backstory detailing the author's summer trips to their grandma's farmhouse where the recipe originated or the vacation to a foreign land where the author had a personal encounter with the dish's chef who, after much cajoling, revealed the secret recipe. Without the backstory, each recipe feels ungrounded and detached from time, place, and even reality…

My particular favourite of this genre is "Maple Shortbread Bars" from The New York Times which starts with the opening "Shortly after the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001" https://cooking.nytimes.com/recipes/1017089-maple-shortbread...

I haven't laughed that hard in a while, WOW. I genuinely wonder if people believe this or if it's necessary fluff to sell.

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#96

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That works for some recipes, but for bread precise is better. I'm astonished when I read bread recipes that casually ask for 2 cups of flour (which could be wildly different amounts).

Looking through your comments, your spelling indicates you might be from a Commonwealth country, which means you might not be familiar with the fact that a "cup" is a standardized measurement in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_(unit)#Customary_cup

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#97

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Should the measurements be included in the instructions or just left out to avoid that? Instead of "add 1/2 teaspoon of ingredient", just say "add ingredient". growing up, we had the old red/white gingham Betty Crocker cookbook where the scaled measurements were written in the book. the instructions never had any of the measurements in them. based on that, it just feels natural to the point of adding the scaling into…

I personally prefer leaving the measurement in the instructions for two reasons. 1. I'll often use the ingredients list (and quantities there) before cooking to ensure that I have everything I need ahead of time. Depending on what ingredient it is, I might not mise en place it. In those cases, a step that says "add ingredient" would require me to go reference the list in the beginning, losing a bit of context. 2. It'…

I've taken to combining them. As in, I put a list of items needed above a paragraph describing what to do. I don't know if it's good, but it helps me.

Example: https://imgur.com/7qXRNTH

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#98
I feel deep gratitude to you for this, and the timing of your post. Thank you!

Seriously. I also feel like you're owed an apology for having had to write this in the first place.

I'm coming at "figuring out the Kitchen" for what is almost the first time in my life in I-wish-I-were-in-my-mid-40s[0] and I'm thinking "The Internet in the Early 00s was pretty good for that." And then I fire up a browser on desktop while making a grocery list and once you filter for "things that are obviously AI Hallucinations representing partial recipes", I'm met with one or all of the following: (1) Pages and pages and pages of obviously made-up nonsense anecdotes about the discovery of this magical, uh, air fryer grilled chicken marinade, (2) a pretty haphazard set of instructions that don't bother to include ingredients separated with pleasant units and conversions, but hide them throughout with quantities like "a few tomatoes" here, "an onion" there, (3) which doesn't seem to impact the 4.8 stars after hundreds of "user ratings.". (4) And rather than help these miserable imprecise, ingredient-less recipes with pictures of what "until moist and brown" might appear, you're going to show me a bunch of chopped ingredients in separated bowls that I don't have and then a picture of it finished, delicately decorated in whatever-or-another sauce, and "HEY, here's some lady who's cooking something unrelated to the recipe in this neat little video window I popped up for you! Let's watch the top of her head and this bowl of something on mute for a little while!"

Good God, man, it's like they've optimized the design to break people with ADHD. Some sites were so bad, it felt like "the actual recipe I was looking for" was obfuscated on the page like sketchy sites will hide the "actual Download button" somewhere unexpected and give you a big green "Download" button that leads to revenue. And that's not even getting into the weird bad on some of these AI-churn sites. I end up opening a notepad on the side and refactoring the things that seem like they might work from time to time, but I popped a few recipes in there, including a Chili recipe that "barely had any problems other than layout and annoying cooking lady videos" and just turned it into the perfect representation of that recipe.

I don't know what the original feedback was, but beyond how clear and organized laid out the recipe, here's what I saw as really useful little touches (I'm half wondering if some were even intended): (1) Besides my affinity for circled numbers, I lose my spot when referring to recipes so I like to print out the ones I really like, laminate them, and mark 'em up with the whiteboard markers I have for fridge notes as I go, you gave me a wonderful spot for that -- I'm so prone to re-read/second-guess where I'm at when I need to "put a bunch of things together at the last moment", that was the first thing I noticed, (2) Your highlighting did the same thing for making my grocery list (I DoorDashed it, today) -- it's so much more readable and "easy to find my spot" the way it appears on my desktop compared to any other site, (3) Because of your choice positioning, I can scroll down slightly and see the ingredients and all of the instructions without having to touch this thing, again, while I'm cooking if I use the tablet in the kitchen.

Oh, and thank you for making it just work in the browser. I hate using my phone for this kind of thing and I'm not even crazy about using my tablet for it.

[0] The backstory being unexpected, but very much desired, custody change led to me cooking for my children all of the time, including one who struggles with weight. I was blessed without that struggle, I eat "whatever" atrociously (not picky), and about what I burn, I'm under-weight and my blood work is perfect. One of my kids is identical, just not the one that sounds exactly like me :).

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#99

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Looking through your comments, your spelling indicates you might be from a Commonwealth country, which means you might not be familiar with the fact that a "cup" is a standardized measurement in the US. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cup_(unit)#Customary_cup

Yes but it's a measure of _volume_, whereas flour is best measured by _weight_. Any volume measurement of flour can vary wildly depending on many factors, such as how densely packed it is. King Arthur Flour have a short video[0] demonstrating the wildly different weight measurements from measuring a "cup" (the same cup size across samples). Measuring liquids by volume is totally fine because you generally won't get a…

Absolutely, which is why you need an ingredient weight chart. There are print versions, but personally I have this link bookmarked and it comes out every time I bake: https://www.kingarthurbaking.com/learn/ingredient-weight-cha...

Re: Show HN: Onlyrecipe 2.0 – I added all features HN requested – 4 years later

#100

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Yes but it's a measure of _volume_, whereas flour is best measured by _weight_. Any volume measurement of flour can vary wildly depending on many factors, such as how densely packed it is. King Arthur Flour have a short video[0] demonstrating the wildly different weight measurements from measuring a "cup" (the same cup size across samples). Measuring liquids by volume is totally fine because you generally won't get a…

Absolutely, which is why you need an ingredient weight chart. There are print versions, but personally I have this link bookmarked and it comes out every time I bake: https://www.kingarthurbaking.com/learn/ingredient-weight-cha...

But that doesn't work. The chart states that 1 cup of 00 flour is 116g which is simply not true. It _might_ be 116g, but it could also be 200g (!). Volume measurement is simply not suitable for baking.

For things like sauces or marinades, you use a much smaller amount, and approximate is generally fine.

Post reply on HN