91–100 of 128 posts
"Additionally, regardless of whether an Action is using self-hosted runners, Actions should not be used for: the provision of a stand-alone or integrated application or service offering the Actions product or service, or any elements of the Actions product or service, for commercial purposes"
Edit: Oh, Hetzner. They’re really ubiquitous in cheap computing these days.
what stops GitHub from shutting down these offerings from a legal or technical perspective, these alternatives clearly violate their terms of service: "Additionally, regardless of whether an Action is using self-hosted runners, Actions should not be used for: the provision of a stand-alone or integrated application or service offering the Actions product or service, or any elements of the Actions product or service,…
E.g. don’t use Github as Infrastructure as a Service.
I was looking for macOS M1 runner, which is not provided by GitHub. I'm willing to pay for that, but it seems that there are only Linux types now.
Hi there, I'm Ozgun, one of Ubicloud's founders. We have dozens of customers using Ubicloud runners in production today. We’re now designing our caching layer (Docker instance registry, Docker layer cache, or package cache). We wanted to put this out there for any comments. Also, if you have any points related to the broader topic of an open and portable cloud, please pass them along!
Yes, please do what Depot does and put fast persistent disks close to builds to cache docker layers. Github action runners and circleci and all the others adding expensive network calls to manually cache layers has always been such a time sink and I think moves lots of people to remove caching entirely.
Sure would be good to see competition for the MacOS and Windows runners too, these are the ones that tend to cost us the most.
I was looking for macOS M1 runner, which is not provided by GitHub. I'm willing to pay for that, but it seems that there are only Linux types now.