Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
91–100 of 113 posts
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#92Yes, UI is a wreck. In addition, services like this demonstrate a fundamental lack of understanding as to what logos are for and how they function. You can't communicate your brand's identity effectively by clicking some buttons and going on your "gut." Do yourself a favor: pay for a professional.
Oh, thank God. I saw that this link was second, checked it out and was baffled. I'm glad this is the first comment, I almost got scared people were praising the service. I agree with everything you said. A crappy logo is 100 times worse than no logo.
http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3620/3321936091_04ff285b5e_o....
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#93Earlier quoted context omitted.
Oh, thank God. I saw that this link was second, checked it out and was baffled. I'm glad this is the first comment, I almost got scared people were praising the service. I agree with everything you said. A crappy logo is 100 times worse than no logo.
A crappy logo might be 734 billion times better than no logo. http://farm4.static.flickr.com/3620/3321936091_04ff285b5e_o....
I don't know why we have to always take the most improbable one-in-a-time cases like Facebook, Amazon, and other huge corporations and compared them with regular folks (whom are the ones who would use this tool).
In this case, what does that prove?
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#94Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#95Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#96Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#97I used LogoJoy [1] a year or so ago to create a logo for my side business. This appears to have a lot of the same "designs" available as LogoJoy, but with a much less intuitive UX. [1]: https://logojoy.com/
OP is a lot better.
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#98I used LogoJoy [1] a year or so ago to create a logo for my side business. This appears to have a lot of the same "designs" available as LogoJoy, but with a much less intuitive UX. [1]: https://logojoy.com/
This feels like the logos are better than there and logojoy took me through far too many steps. Leaving the forced registration to right before you even get to see the logos they generated. OP is a lot better.
I preferred the design process at LogoJoy though, especially the choice of colors and explaining what the colors often mean.
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#99Earlier quoted context omitted.
Quick side note, noticed a small typo on your website: "Ad networks on free comment systems do more then hurt your brand, they also track, spy, and slow down your pages", that "then" should be "than", just fyi :-) https://writingexplained.org/more-than-or-more-then-differen... if of any interest
Thank you, I have been struggling my whole life with this mistake.
Re: Show HN: LogoFox – fast logo maker
#100Fantastic concept! But I'm completely turned off by the IP terms ([1] below). This suggests LogoFox is pushing icons without doing IP checks, and selling them as finished logo designs without any assurance that the user won't get sued because of this. Don't take this as negative feedback, but as a tip to re-think the legal side approach. Better would be that you (a) you do some copyright checks and your terms state w…
If the client only wants to pay $29 or even $990, that barely covers a meeting and a few sketches.