I find it odd how people are hating on the idea here, while this could obviously be a lot better than the alternative... you know unencrypted video files that someone can access whenever they want. The concerns I'd have with this myself would be that I'd have to trust the website. As it is I trust my spouse a lot more than some cloud service and I don't expect that to change.
Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
91–100 of 207 posts
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#92This is a really cool concept. But ultimately you cannot get past the analog hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole
> How do I know my partner won't abuse my trust?
> You can't. However with Rumuki you have the discretion to only grant playbacks when you can keep an eye on them. You also have the option to revoke all playback grants and delete the recording if trust is ever lost.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#93This app would have saved my career a couple years ago. Now, when I visit the old office to say hi to my ex-colleagues, I still can't get past the nickname they gave me because of what happened.
I believe environments auto-eject those people who do not belong there anyway, the reason does not matter.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#94People don't care that much about how things are encrypted or about complex security mechanisms, they want something that is easy to use. Snapshat is easy to use for example. Everyone knows that a snap can be saved like everybody knows that I can film a phone playing a video. Given that the practical security of both apps are the same, people will go for ease of use and Snapshat wins there.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#95This is not foolproof. What if someone records the video from another phone while playing. Similar to snapchat.
I think the idea is that during the relationship both parties are at peace so neither party will have any desire to do something underhanded like recording the video from another phone. This app addresses the problem that occurs when the relationship ends on a bad note and one party has to the urge to harm the other through whatever means necessary.
Well... The viewer needs to request permission from the partner, and may want to bypass that. Furthermore, a given video may have more than two partecipants, and the app seems to be limited to pairs of people. In such situations the video will need to be shared with those people too.
The most secure option is to have one encrypted copy of the file and only that, and decrypt only when viewing it, and only temporarily. Even then it's possible to make recordings of the content as tiny hideable cameras are sold everywhere. I'm not dismissing the work done, but if someone is as careful about security to use such an app, they can also do the best thing and not record at all.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#96This is not foolproof. What if someone records the video from another phone while playing. Similar to snapchat.
> How do I know my partner won't abuse my trust?
> You can't. However with Rumuki you have the discretion to only grant playbacks when you can keep an eye on them. You also have the option to revoke all playback grants and delete the recording if trust is ever lost.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#97Earlier quoted context omitted.
I don't get the point of sextapes. I have excellent recall, so why do I need a video record?
I don't get the point of handcuffs in the bedroom, but some people like them, so that's up to them. If you don't understand someone's sexual preference, the correct response is no response. You're not obligated to comment on everything.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#98This is not foolproof. What if someone records the video from another phone while playing. Similar to snapchat.
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#99This is a really cool concept. But ultimately you cannot get past the analog hole. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Analog_hole
Re: Show HN: Rumuki, a prenup for sex tapes
#100Earlier quoted context omitted.
What did you expect?
I expected my colleagues to respect the things I do in private and realize I'm just human. And at the very least, if they were going to publicly respond, I'd have expected them to compliment me instead.
When you let it be recorded and the recording be possessed by someone else, it's practically public, as you can't control what'll happen in future and there will always be mean people that'll try to bully you for that sort of thing. I'm sad that it's caused you harm, but I guess in such situations showing confidence might work.