Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

readkinetic.com

81–85 of 85 posts

Re: Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

#81

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or someone like me who reads often, and at great volume, and wants to read more. Not everyone is like you.

That's the profile I keep bumping into, people who already read a lot and want the volume rather than a shortcut. What does your load actually look like, out of interest? I'm trying to work out where the line sits between the reading you'd want this for and the reading you'd want to slow down for. Everyone seems to draw it somewhere slightly different and I don't think I've got it right yet.

I ask you to question why those 'avid readers' are looking for a shortcut to increase their volume rather than a shortcut to increase their comprehension. Looking at this users are comments, his desire is simply to increase the tally rather than any genuine interest in reading.

Re: Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

#82

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Or someone like me who reads often, and at great volume, and wants to read more. Not everyone is like you.

What do you read?

Anything that interests me. I can see you're not asking in good faith based on your other comments (and indeed, even calling something pointless just because you personally don't see a benefit, which is a useless way to understand things) so I will reply in kind. As I said, not everyone is like you, so maybe you're the one who simply reads too slow for it to matter.

Re: Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

#83

Earlier quoted context omitted.

That's the profile I keep bumping into, people who already read a lot and want the volume rather than a shortcut. What does your load actually look like, out of interest? I'm trying to work out where the line sits between the reading you'd want this for and the reading you'd want to slow down for. Everyone seems to draw it somewhere slightly different and I don't think I've got it right yet.

I ask you to question why those 'avid readers' are looking for a shortcut to increase their volume rather than a shortcut to increase their comprehension. Looking at this users are comments, his desire is simply to increase the tally rather than any genuine interest in reading.

False dichotomy that reading more does not mean understanding more, that's why you ironically don't understand. Why would I read more just to keep up some artificial count if it doesn't heed my knowledge?

Re: Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

#84

Earlier quoted context omitted.

What do you read?

Anything that interests me. I can see you're not asking in good faith based on your other comments (and indeed, even calling something pointless just because you personally don't see a benefit, which is a useless way to understand things) so I will reply in kind. As I said, not everyone is like you, so maybe you're the one who simply reads too slow for it to matter.

All the better for it. Although I apologise if my wording came off as 'bad faith.'

Re: Show HN: ReadKinetic – a free, local-first speed reader for your own books

#85

The idea looks cool , i think along with optimization reading time if it also allows you set your frequency and then read the book accordingly it would really make an impact , for i sometimes want to read slowly if the topic is of my interest. Just a suggestion

We've got up and down arrows, or you can drag vertically to adjust. Funny, you're not the only one who missed that today, so the interface definitely isn't making it obvious. Fixing that is definitely a priority for me. What you're getting at, about having a separate speed for each book, that’s a good idea and worth exploring. Right now, the speed is just one setting for everything. So if you slow things down for a b…

Being a vivid reader , I usually want to read at an speed of the interest I have in subject, for example I love history, so i read it slowly but for tech kind of book i love to read faster and grab whatever i want to from that book, I believe if you cover both of those points mentioned ( UI Correction and speed per book) then it would look more tailored version
Post reply on HN