I'm with the other comments here, but what's the deal with the '120 fps scrolling' blah blah blah? This clearly isn't a game or movie -- why are we talking about frames?
Hey, I should have maybe made this more clear - I definitely don't care that it's 120fps more that the frame rate doesn't drop and we aren't seeing freezes. Initially the project was, with large files, with syntax highlighting especially or switching very large branches. The built-in FPS counter actually proved really helpful in observing these.
Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
81–89 of 89 posts
Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#82Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#83Oh man, that's a great idea. Well done.
Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#84Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#85Would you mind supporting Intel Macs?
Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
not to mention that light themes produce less eye fatigue and strain. but who cares about that
Wouldn't it be the opposite? Light themes cause more blue light and thus increasing eye fatigue.
Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
not to mention that light themes produce less eye fatigue and strain. but who cares about that
And dark themes hide my floaters and are easier on my old eyes. There is not one singular answer for everybody.
Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#88Re: Show HN: I rebuilt the only parts of my IDE I use, in Rust, over a weekend
#89I like how it looks. But the terminal already has excellent diff and commit tools.
I'm curious, what's some user-friendly terminal based tool to say stage only a couple of discontiguous lines from changes in a single file to commit in Git? I think I've tried the git command line "interactive" mode, and is really painful. I find myself going to an IDE, selecting the line and right-clicking + "stage selected ranges" to achieve that.
Have you tried `git add -p`?
There are cases it doesn’t handle well, like if you want something at the bottom of a file with lots of irrelevant changes. And if you want one line but not the line immediately below, then splitting doesn’t work without starting the interactive editor, which can be confusing.