I like the "maintainer stays in control" part, but isn't that also a problem in a way? The AI provider gets paid, the platform gets paid (20% is a lot in my opinion!), and the maintainer gets more unpaid work: another PR to plan, review, revise, merge, and then maintain... that's a lot of work. If people are willing to fund an issue, why should that money mainly cover LLM tokens rather than maintainer effort? Or at l…
Show HN: CleverCrow: give tokens to your favorite projects
81–85 of 85 posts
Re: Show HN: CleverCrow: give tokens to your favorite projects
#82Earlier quoted context omitted.
I really dislike it but the effectiveness of code generation is just too good now. I really doubted it at first but I can churn out 10x the work. Is it the same quality as IC? no but I think that it doesn't matter anymore. How many of us have worked on some 10+m loc monstrosity for years never knowing more than 1% of the codebase? Probably most. Now I can generate that same monstrosity on my own. I've created a 1.1m+…
> Now I can generate that same monstrosity on my own. For what? Why would you need to? > I've created a 1.1m+ loc and growing trading platform that automates options trades based on live ML edges from research papers. Sounds like a lot of "if/else" /j
Re: Show HN: CleverCrow: give tokens to your favorite projects
#83Earlier quoted context omitted.
Then you offer to pay the maintainer their consulting rate to do it if they are willing.
That's one way to go about it, but doesn't exactly work when one has targeted requirements in 20 different projects.
Re: Show HN: CleverCrow: give tokens to your favorite projects
#84Earlier quoted context omitted.
Probably an oversight on my part. I was thinking that backers would find out about CleverCrow through the project maintainers so the public pages are repo specific. As an aside, when you do login, CleverCrow shows projects that you've starred on GitHub to help find things you might want to support.
Oh nice! Does it also require my bank's password?