Feature request: some context, history and/or example of popular usage. Some symbols leave me with more questions than answers, like “LEFT HALF RUNNING MAN”[1]. I’d like to at least see that it’s a glyph part, that there are two in total, and what does the other half look like; right now the “right half running man” is not listed anywhere on that page, not even in the “related symbols” section. Off topic, the running…
Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
81–87 of 87 posts
Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#82Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#83I’m looking at the currency block. Each box has a colored “drop shadow”. I spent a minute or so trying to figure out what the significance of the color is. Finally, I noticed that the color appears to cycle between cyan, magenta, and yellow. Is this a design element only, or do the colors actually have some meaning with respect to the symbol?
Purely cosmetic. In hindsight, probably unnecessary — but once you add color, it’s hard to stop
The symbols on that page could be a bit bigger, though, as they are the main subject. (I changed 1.125rem to something like 1.6rem for text-lg; that works, but it could get a bit crowded with the clickable arrow on lower resolution screens).
I'm not a huge fan of things that move; the offset of a block of symbols, as well as scaling of an individual symbol block when hovering seems a bit too much. I would do either, but not both.
Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#84It doesn't fit my definition of "clean" at all, but that's a subjective word anyway. I do have some feedback (unrelated to being clean): - The search field is arguably the most important element on the site. It might benefit from a magnifying glass icon and/or some visual distinctions that make it actually look like a text input for searching. It's thick border and shadow make it look like all the other boxes on the…
Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#85Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get where you are coming from, and have put some thought into it. I built the site over 20 years ago, and while it was fun to make, I wouldn't have maintained it this long if is was costing me every month. I've tried to minimize the intrusiveness: I disabled the pop-up and interstitial ads and I don't serve anything different to people with ad-blockers. And I've stuck with Google Adwords, despite requests from all…
Isn’t it just a bunch of static pages? You can get that hosted for free.
The newer things I'm doing (like UnicodeSearch.org) are static, though I don't like forcing everyone to have JavaScript enabled.
Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#86Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get where you are coming from, and have put some thought into it. I built the site over 20 years ago, and while it was fun to make, I wouldn't have maintained it this long if is was costing me every month. I've tried to minimize the intrusiveness: I disabled the pop-up and interstitial ads and I don't serve anything different to people with ad-blockers. And I've stuck with Google Adwords, despite requests from all…
Isn’t it just a bunch of static pages? You can get that hosted for free.
Re: Show HN: One clean, developer-focused page for every Unicode symbol
#87Earlier quoted context omitted.
I get where you are coming from, and have put some thought into it. I built the site over 20 years ago, and while it was fun to make, I wouldn't have maintained it this long if is was costing me every month. I've tried to minimize the intrusiveness: I disabled the pop-up and interstitial ads and I don't serve anything different to people with ad-blockers. And I've stuck with Google Adwords, despite requests from all…
I’m glad to hear it’s helping you keep the costs down - that’s positive. It’s the type of popup that triggers my allergy - which as allergies go is mostly my problem.