Earlier quoted context omitted.
Ah, wow, thank you for the links and additional context. This is new information to me. > Their copyright holder may step forward at any time after you've treated it as unlicensed. Does this mean that Satoshi can just come and claim that a whole industry is using his/her copyrighted material?
The above is specifically about book copyright on orphaned works.. AFAIK there is no copyrighting of the contents of a blockchain that they could defend (I'm assuming that's what you're referring to). That copyright would hypothetically cover redistribution, which is kind of a necessary aspect of the shared ledger in the first place. The more appropriate coverage for that would be patents, which protect a process whi…
Thank you so much for taking the time to explain!