Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
71–80 of 185 posts
Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#72Earlier quoted context omitted.
Making 1 click to access is faster than typing the app name in finder. Dock is usually full and used for different type of apps. Makes also constantly visible output possible with standard ui patterns.
> Dock is usually full My menu bar is also full and, unlike the Dock, I can’t resize it to fit more.
Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#73This is pretty nice, but why do a lot of Mac apps insist on living in the menu bar?
Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#74Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#75Earlier quoted context omitted.
> Dock is usually full My menu bar is also full and, unlike the Dock, I can’t resize it to fit more.
You can put it in a secondary onclick taskbar with Ice (similarly to Windows)
Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#76Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#77Earlier quoted context omitted.
You can put it in a secondary onclick taskbar with Ice (similarly to Windows)
Just a heads up Ice is abandoned and broken on upcoming versions of MacOS. I still need to look into an alternative
Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#78Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#79Re: Show HN: WhatCable, a tiny menu bar app for inspecting USB-C cables
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
For some reason the app supports a separate standalone window mode as well [0]. It's not clear why the developer took the trouble to support two different modes when the menubar mode doesn't seem to add anything (like a live-updating icon for throughput). Well, I can think of one reason why it wasn't that much more trouble. François Chollet had a nice tweet [1] on why removing human cognitive friction is resulting in…
> removing human cognitive friction is resulting in needless software complexity This is kind of a hilarious statement just on the surface. Isn't removing burden from humans the whole purpose of software? How can you call the complexity "needless"?! (the actual tweet seems to go into a bit more detail around being incentivized to find good abstractions)