Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

vidstudio.app

71–80 of 120 posts

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#71
post #30

Wild that apps used to be completely local, no accounts, no uploads, and we're back to that as a value prop.

Agreed but I guess at the same time those who spend money to develop software need to find ways to monetise I just wish they were not so predatory. Everything is a subscription now siphoning money out of users on a monthly basis.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#72
post #24

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Dynamically and statically linked libs is hilarious in the context of webassembly running in the browser.

You can have multiple WASM modules communicating with each other (though you would probably need extra interop code?), or statically link them into a single module, the concepts work mostly the same

With a browser plugin I'm sure you could swap out a WASM module on the fly, if said plugin doesn't exist, maybe it should. Would make debugging in a prod URL simpler if you can just load a page with a testing WASM file.

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#75
Congrats on shipping this!

I went down the same path for videotobe.com, fully client-side with ffmpeg.wasm, and it fell over on longer videos. The memory ceiling and encode times pushed me to a cloud processing pipeline.

You've managed to solve both, the WebCodecs plus Pixi plus ffmpeg.wasm split looks like the right decomposition in hindsight.I processed 3+ hrs of media using VidStudio and it held up. Nicely done!

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#76
post #67
post #12

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Thank you for pointing this out, to be completely honest, I did not consider licensing because the website started as a collection of tools I built to run locally and get into video/audio codecs then I realised it is already a decent collection of tools that other people might want to use too. But I will be making the needed changes to comply fully tonight. At least I comply with this: `Do not misspell FFmpeg (two ca…

Wonder this guy is doing it? Or is it also not open sourced? https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42207002

that guy is not including ffmpeg and is not encoding in browser. What he is doing is generating a ffmpeg command that you can run on your cli/scripts etc.

PS: i am that guy :-)

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#78
post #70

I recently did something similar but as a Mac app. It sounds like a similar stack, but distributed as an app. FFmpeg (LGPL compilation). I haven't tried Pixi.js, looks interesting. I guess it was good for this. Have you looked at remotion? I found them good for somethings, but ended up using Safari for rendering (instead of remotion's chrome-based rendering) because app packaging was easier that way. https://www.lore…

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: VidStudio, a browser based video editor that doesn't upload your files

#79

I love no accounts and no cloud a lot! Wondering if it support subtitle and transcript? It would be helpful for non-native speaker use case. Also, can you talk more about the use case difference between VidStudio vs. Finalcut/Imovie/Premiere? I am quite interested. Thanks

[deleted]
Post reply on HN