Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

hackersmacker.org

71–80 of 179 posts

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#71

Another step towards the Redditification of hackernews. This is the exact opposite kind of functionality pages like HN need, we need ways to get people to engage with others' ideas more substantively rather than literally put someone on the "bad guy I won't talk to list".

people seem to prefer only reading things from people they agree with

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#72
post #52

I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”

favorite / potato Although there are some commenters I would want to follow because they are potato. There is something so magical about some of the more delulu Take Havers around here.

As a boomer, I had fun trying to decode your last sentence!

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#74

Interesting. I'd love to have a browser extension that automatically blocks all comment sections on every site I visit, so I wouldn't feel the need to interact with anyone online.

Lol, I had a self-extension for a short while like that https://github.com/roshan/hnncnn/blob/master/hnncnn.js

But now I prefer blocking and favouriting people https://overmod.org/

There are good commenters here. Just overshadowed by lots of garbage.

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#75

I’d encourage a change of labels away from “friend/foe”. It may seem minor but the subtle loaded nature of those paired terms encourages an adversarial stance rather than one of productive discourse. It’s not catchy so there’s probably better than this but, just as an example— “engage/ignore” could better signal to the user a neutral “do I want to bother with this person?”

Bring back hot or not!

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#76
How would two neutral labels sound? There's something somewhat confrontational about "friend/foe" and those dynamics seem to worsen discussion. At the least, it should auto hide "foes", since predisposing people to be against a comment before reading it isn't ideal. Neutral labels, like "apple/orange", with slight connotations could be interesting. Of course, this kills networks, but I'd question if that's even a good idea in the first place.

Re: Show HN: Hacker Smacker – Spot great (and terrible) HN commenters at a glance

#78
post #46
post #14

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> There are some trolls in here that seemingly evade getting banned despite their moronic comments... As moderators we can only judge comments according to the guidelines, and can only ban accounts if they repeatedly breach them. You're always welcome to email us (hn@ycombinator.com) about an account that has been continually breaching the guidelines.

I think that's the point though? Plenty of things not worth engaging with also aren't technically violating any rules: but wasting the brainpower on them also isn't worth it in a reliable way. That's where an ignore system is useful.

Sure, I was just addressing the apparent dissatisfaction that some accounts remain active despite posting “moronic” comments, and pointing out that we can't moderate HN according to our judgement of someone's comments being “moronic”, we can only apply the guidelines that everyone on HN implicitly agrees to follow. (To expand on that: “moronic” will mean different things to different people depending on their worldview; whereas the guidelines and our application of them need to be defensible, regardless of the position.)

We hope that people will take the opportunity that HN offers, to be exposed to different points of view, if only because it helps you to become more knowledgeable and confident about your own positions. We understand not everyone is here for that!

Post reply on HN