Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

github.com

71–80 of 112 posts

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#72

For me, the ideal music player UI started and ended with Winamp, and I never liked any of the higher level ones, no need for music libraries etc. Recursive directory scan, delete what is not needed, flat playlist, can save any, the end. Also, the minimalistic window of Winamp is just perfect.

Winamp is OG, so why not both!

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#73

I've been looking for an alternative since Apple decided to turn iTunes into the mess that is Apple Music. But I still need to import the two decades of playing statistics (skips, last played, etc) along with ratings, date added, etc. Petrichor looks really good, congratulations, I'll try it out.

I'm in the same situation, but if we take a rational look at it those statistics don't really have any value. If you can make different playlists in your new player according to your old ratings, then that should be enough.

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#74

I've been looking for an alternative since Apple decided to turn iTunes into the mess that is Apple Music. But I still need to import the two decades of playing statistics (skips, last played, etc) along with ratings, date added, etc. Petrichor looks really good, congratulations, I'll try it out.

I'm in the same situation, but if we take a rational look at it those statistics don't really have any value. If you can make different playlists in your new player according to your old ratings, then that should be enough.

On the contrary, I find them priceless.

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#75
post #20

If you are looking for a “old school iTunes” kind of player there’s also https://swinsian.com/

A friend of mine (sound engineer) has been using VLC player for audio playback since forever. I do the same.

The advantage is that you are forced to organize your music in your file system and that translates incredibly well to all other future systems. Want a special playlist? Just copy the files over and name them with a numeric prefix counting up. You can open that playlist ten years later on a different operating system.

Since I tend to listen to full albums, this has been a good way of doing things.

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#76
post #67

Earlier quoted context omitted.

If it's just a signing thing that Apple checks, you open run it by doing `xattr -d com.apple.quarantine filename` first.

or I think if you right click and then open the app, macOS lets you run it.

fwiw this won't work in macOS 15.6

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#79
post #36

For me, the ideal music player UI started and ended with Winamp, and I never liked any of the higher level ones, no need for music libraries etc. Recursive directory scan, delete what is not needed, flat playlist, can save any, the end. Also, the minimalistic window of Winamp is just perfect.

The 'Win' in Winamp was referring to Windows. This is a Mac application.

The platform is irrelevant, that UI design would apply to most platforms (MacOS for sure).

Re: Show HN: Petrichor – a free, open-source, offline music player for macOS

#80
post #62

The most issues I encounter with music players are related to my situation of NAS. My NAS is straightforward: I just connect a RAID to a Mac and share it, then let other Macs connect to this "server". This allows me to access it in Finder like any other directory. However, this setup presents two obvious problems for many players: First, since the directory is not always available (if I'm not at home), some players c…

I find Synology's DS Audio pretty decent because it has mobile apps and local playback through a web interface, although very little confidence in them as a company.
Post reply on HN