Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Tally Forms – A free Typeform alternative

tally.so

71–73 of 73 posts

Re: Show HN: Tally Forms – A free Typeform alternative

#71
post #60

Earlier quoted context omitted.

> This is a terrible idea - the data isn’t yours until it’s been explicitly given. I couldn't disagree more. I think the owner of a website should be able to track whatever information they please about your session.

Would you also support Wallmart following you around their store, keeping track of which isles you walked, which way you looked, conversations you had with your spouse next to you as you shopped, etc? It's their store. They should be entitled to own everything about you when you walk into their store, right?

I mean, Walmart almost certainly do track everyone's movement around their stores to see how to improve their conversion rates.

When I worked for UK financial company we would track how far people were going through our form wizard to see where the paint points were. The personal information never left the web page, but it would report back telemetry telling us how many people dropped out at each stage. That helped us to do split testing, e.g. does this label make more people fill out the form, etc.

Re: Show HN: Tally Forms – A free Typeform alternative

#73
post #70

Earlier quoted context omitted.

You can build anything you want after acquiring the end user's informed consent. A user knows what a draft is, and would agree to such a feature upon pressing a button that indicates that the draft will be saved for later by submitting the form verbatim as-is to the server Saving everything a user types in, without a user's informed consent, is a severe trust violation.

Well, that was a ridiculously non-general treatment of my attempt to lift this question to an actual abstraction. Again, OP isn't selling things directly to end-users, so I don't know how the OP is meant to acquire the end user's consent, informed or not. The OP is exposing abilities in a tool which enables his end users to turn around and deliver something to their end users. My question is how culpable OP is for ab…

> OP isn't selling things directly to end-users

That's ridiculous. If you provide a whitelabel solution, you simply add consent checkboxes and and explanatory text, the same way shop systems and virtually all other whitelabel software meant to be embedded works.

> how culpable OP is for abuse of his tool's abilities

Regulators don't care where you sourced the software from that you provided. You provide it, you host it, you're culpable.

Post reply on HN