(Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
71–80 of 190 posts
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#72I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#73I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
> (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
Tumblr does this at the moment. It asks for either email click or a traditional username/password setup.
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#74I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#75This is delightfully crazy. Give some random guys with no website your registration record somewhere, allow them to verify your registration as theirs, and then impersonate you, reset passwords, see any communications, possibly log in as yourself and do anything. All this with no recourse. Nigerian spammers moan from envy for such a brilliant self-propelled gullibility filter.
It's hilarious.
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#76I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)
I’ve never used the feature. I have an integrated password manager.
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#77Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#78Earlier quoted context omitted.
I will call support to notify them my e-mail (with a + in it) isn't working, like I have done before. No I don't have another e-mail address. Yes, this is really my e-mail address.
To be fair, I would assume/hope the implementation is gmail specific and just truncs the + part only when doing uniqueness validation. Granted its effectiveness is small.
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#79Doesn't mailinator (mailinator.com) already do this ?
Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com
#80Earlier quoted context omitted.
Also Mailinator is banned by multiple sites and I feel like that number is increasing (anecdata). Which means it's getting less and less useful for the purpose of "burner" email addresses.
You can point your own domain to mailinator mx records for free. Don’t have a domain to throw spam at? Pick a sub domain and use that.