Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

news.ycombinator.com

71–80 of 190 posts

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#71
I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that?

(Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#72
post #71

I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

Passwordless authentication exists, Medium has it, I've implemented it before, and I prefer it myself. The biggest issue being it adds an additional step, that most don't want to deal with. What if they don't have access to their email on that machine? Blasphemy, but it happens.

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#73
post #71

I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

> I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that?

> (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

Tumblr does this at the moment. It asks for either email click or a traditional username/password setup.

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#74
post #71

I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

Medium actually does this.

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#75
post #23

This is delightfully crazy. Give some random guys with no website your registration record somewhere, allow them to verify your registration as theirs, and then impersonate you, reset passwords, see any communications, possibly log in as yourself and do anything. All this with no recourse. Nigerian spammers moan from envy for such a brilliant self-propelled gullibility filter.

I have first.last@gmail.com and I've had people play poker and lottery and sign up for dating websites with my e-mail address. I've also received confidential information from insurance and building construction companies.

It's hilarious.

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#76
post #71

I've always wanted sort of the opposite. I'd sign up to a website, and they wouldn't ask for a password. To login, they would email a link to click and I'd be logged in for however long that cookie lasted. Why don't sites do that? (Is email still considered slow? I remember having wait times in the hours back in the 90s, but I'm not sure I've ever waited anywhere near a minute in the past decade.)

Tumblr does that now.

I’ve never used the feature. I have an integrated password manager.

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#78

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I will call support to notify them my e-mail (with a + in it) isn't working, like I have done before. No I don't have another e-mail address. Yes, this is really my e-mail address.

To be fair, I would assume/hope the implementation is gmail specific and just truncs the + part only when doing uniqueness validation. Granted its effectiveness is small.

This would not account for emails which have a custom subdomain but are still hosted by gmail, which will behave the same way as gmail with respect to the "+" sign (I've seen many universities do this).

Re: Show HN: Startup with no website - GuerillaClick@gmail.com

#80
post #56
post #42

Earlier quoted context omitted.

Also Mailinator is banned by multiple sites and I feel like that number is increasing (anecdata). Which means it's getting less and less useful for the purpose of "burner" email addresses.

You can point your own domain to mailinator mx records for free. Don’t have a domain to throw spam at? Pick a sub domain and use that.

I used Mailinator as the quick solution to access some one time resources on websites that forced me to register. It was the simplicity of the throwaway email that made it attractive to me. But when it's blocked on a website I usually wouldn't want to bother with c more complicated setup. If the effort is justified then I can probably use a regular email address. Other people might have different use cases.
Post reply on HN