Show HN: Realm for Android
61–66 of 66 posts
Re: Show HN: Realm for Android
#62Honestly, SQLite has a lot of utilities, tutorials, useful adapters and UI hooks in Android. Core Data similarly on iOS. If you want me to go to your framework instead, you'd have to provide something better than just redoing the API. E.g. network sync like Couch does.
I do agree that net syncing would definitely be a killer feature for me as well, but it's probably not the case for the average project ( which probably uses custom web services for crud on the serve side).
Re: Show HN: Realm for Android
#63Given the insert speeds, I'm guessing they're (still) not reusing compiled statements. I mentioned this last time I saw Realm on the front page[1], but their benchmarks are misleading without at least mentioning that they're doing this. I'm still very much interested in Realm, and LOVE having a competitor to SQLite. But don't mislead your customers. [1]: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8043332 where seepel finds…
That was a totally 100% fair point you made when we launched for iOS, and something we had completely overlooked. Your comment immediately prompted us to update our bench code to reuse compiled statements and, we’ve been using updated charts to document our iOS performance since then (e.g.: https://speakerdeck.com/timanglade/realm-overview-at-the-sil... ). See other comment ( https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=8390…
Thanks again for looking into it and updating the material - far too many groups just gloss over (glaring) problems with their micro benchmarks, and it just sours all their future claims. Glad you're not one of them :)
Re: Show HN: Realm for Android
#64So data is persisted totally independently of the SQLite engine? Straight in the file system?
Re: Show HN: Realm for Android
#65Error:Exception thrown while constructing Processor object: io/realm/processor/RealmProcessor : Unsupported major.minor version 51.0
Re: Show HN: Realm for Android
#66Earlier quoted context omitted.
I use Parceler ( https://github.com/johncarl81/parceler ) with gson. So gson for network data, then parceler for passing parcels around between activities/fragments.
Doesn't this require annotating the class? What if I can't change the class implementation?