I see little to no information on whether or not it really whips the llama's ass
Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
61–70 of 84 posts
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#62Call me crazy but iTunes/Music has always been one of the things I like most about macOS, at least after going through the settings and disabling all the features trying to push you into a subscription. I still manage my own ~500 file mp3 collection instead of paying monthly.
> I still manage my own ~500 file mp3 collection Huh? Just checked my 'collection': Total Files Listed: 17250 File(s) 232,520,192,270 bytes 6431 Dir(s) 1,053,563,486,208 bytes free Not audiophile scale, for sure - but only 500 looks quite low. No wonder iTunes can manage it snorts .
208,778 Files 1,799 GB
Mostly MP3.
*slightly inflated file/music count due to album covers/metadata.
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#63Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#64Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#65Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#66Another alternative is Reamp, I’ve been using it for years, it’s macOS and directly supports Winamp skins. The site is a little shady though! https://re-amp.ru/en
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#67Earlier quoted context omitted.
At 26MB setup package it most likely doesn't.
We tried to keep it as lean as possible. MacOS itself adds quite a bit, and then there are libraries for format decoding, audio streaming, VST support, etc. Could it be smaller? Probably – but not by an order of magnitude.
Wait, it doesn't do that does it?
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#68The Buy button is kinda signaling, that they don't understand, what Winamp and this whole time was about... New tools with a frenetic mdding scene behind it, max customization, no tutorials, but digging through every file to see what you can change, bulky windows, which all needed to be arranged aside, like browser, napster, icq, winamp, your cs server chat in a thick browser.
I miss these times too. And I’d like to remind you that Winamp used to be a $10 shareware app (that’s roughly $30 in today’s dollars). The first version of Winamp didn't have any windows, it was pure utility application. Do you still think there's value in "max customization"?
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#69Another alternative is Reamp, I’ve been using it for years, it’s macOS and directly supports Winamp skins. The site is a little shady though! https://re-amp.ru/en
Re: Show HN: We missed Winamp, so we built an audio player for macOS
#70Does it support Milkdrop2 visualizations?