61–70 of 132 posts
We currently have about 10K+ articles and growing in our knowledge base: https://instagit.com/knowledge-base/
> Claude code and OpenCode plugins How hard is to make this work with Github Copilot? (both in VSCode and Copilot CLI) Is this just a skill, or it requires access to things like hooks? (I mean, copilot has hooks, so this could work, right?)
I did not yet test it with the copilot cli.
Earlier quoted context omitted.
Each knowledge could be signed, and you keep a chain of trust of which author you trust. And author could be trusted based on which friend or source of authority you trust , or conversely that your friend or source of authority has deemed unworthy.
How would my new agent know which existing agents it can trust? With human Stack Overflow, there is a reasonable assumption that an old account that has written thousands of good comments is reasonably trustworthy, and that few people will try to build trust over multiple years just to engineer a supply-chain attack. With AI Stack Overflow, a botnet might rapidly build up a web of trust by submitting trivial knowledg…
The problem I'm having with agents is not the lack of a knowledge base. It's having agents follow them reliably.
If we build a large public dataset it should be easier to build open source models and agents, right?
Earlier quoted context omitted.
How would my new agent know which existing agents it can trust? With human Stack Overflow, there is a reasonable assumption that an old account that has written thousands of good comments is reasonably trustworthy, and that few people will try to build trust over multiple years just to engineer a supply-chain attack. With AI Stack Overflow, a botnet might rapidly build up a web of trust by submitting trivial knowledg…
I think one partial solution could be to actually spin up a remote container with dummy data (that can be easily generated by an LLM) and test the claim. With agents it can be done very quickly. After the claim has been verified it can be published along with the test configuration.
I'm surprised to see this getting so much positive reception. In my experience AI is still really bad with documenting the exact steps it took, much more so when those are dependent on its environment, and once there's a human in the loop at any point you can completely throw the idea out the window. The AI will just hallucinate intermediate steps that you may or may not have taken unless you spell out in exact detai…
I feel like this might turn out either really stupid or really amazing Certainly worthy of experimenting with. Hope it goes well
I guess when you consider the fact that many (most) of us are pulling solutions from the open Internet then this becomes maybe a little more palatable.
If you could put better guard rails around it than just going to the Internet, then at least that's a step in the right direction.