Unusual tones all around in the thread here. My initial observations before reading the comments here: * "wow, OSS projects are starting to have some pretty wild landing pages, guess it's not just AI logos at the top of the README anymore" * "wow, all in one commit. was it vibe-one-shotted, curated private work that was squashed, or something in between" * "wow, Zig is kind easy to read although I really don't want t…
Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
61–70 of 78 posts
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#62Earlier quoted context omitted.
sure, i hereby disclose that he left in September i already said in another reply that i knew him personally
Well, in that case I'm curious... Why did you think hijacking OP's stance of "Claude did rewrote lots of my original messy code" with your own opposing position of "the project itself is not AI", and getting quite offensive about it, would benefit any discussion about this 13h old project? It's a personal project of your dear ex-colleague, mind you!
because we've been discussing architecture, optimisations and benchmarks
because it's not a 13h old project
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#63Earlier quoted context omitted.
I’d invite you to reconsider the kind of language you’re using to interact with other forum members here. Dropping to profanities is not conducive to maintaining an environment that’s facilitating dialogue between its members. I’ve seen you at least twice call other members here “you idiot”, “get lost”. Etc. Have a hard think as to whether you could rephrase that without the name calling, and if at worse you can’t ma…
the way he came barging through the door doesn’t invite sympathy
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#64I paired with Claude and simply added nats.c to the zig buildup system for my zig project at work. It works like a charm.
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Given that this entire project is a single[1] vibe-coded commit, I really doubt the author bothered buying hardware to test it. [1]: https://github.com/bustermq/bustermq/commits/master/
Who cares whether it’s vibe coded ? As long as it’s good and well maintained over time of course. Maybe there is a niche market for artisanal software engineering where real humans make holes in punchcards, but I would not bet.
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#66Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#67Why use Basel instead of Zig build tools, as it’s all written in Zig anyway?
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#68Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#69Unusual tones all around in the thread here. My initial observations before reading the comments here: * "wow, OSS projects are starting to have some pretty wild landing pages, guess it's not just AI logos at the top of the README anymore" * "wow, all in one commit. was it vibe-one-shotted, curated private work that was squashed, or something in between" * "wow, Zig is kind easy to read although I really don't want t…
Is it bad if I work in private and then squash?
Re: Show HN: BusterMQ, Thread-per-core NATS server in Zig with io_uring
#70Earlier quoted context omitted.
[flagged]
Sure, the author just happened to one-shot a project and a landing page on new year's eve. And their writing style is just coincidentally very similar to Claude's. Who's going to buy that?