Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
61–70 of 131 posts
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#62Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#63If you are approaching this from a potential business perspective that will not be the major issue. As you can tell from the comments most people do want their screen recordings on a remote service, now matter the policies involved.
That leaves you with some options :
1) Encrypt the outgoing WebRTC stream before it leaves the client device/browser (e.g. through WebRTC Insertable Streams or similar), encoded with a client local key that only your customer knows/manages. This ensures any screen recordings stored on your end cannot be accessed in any way. They can then download the recordings as needed and decrypt on demand. Note that this still has the implication of you storing and transmitting massive amounts of data which is likely to become cost prohibitive as a service.
2) As above but do the decrypting for your customer on your end so they get to download playable media. This obviously introduces the security risk of your platform becoming temporarily able to 'see' the content.
3) Save your recording directly through MediaRecorder WebM or similar (has various browser compatibility challenges as standards materialize) and uses less obvious encodings (we're still living with the bullshit of H.264 requiring licensing).
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#64Earlier quoted context omitted.
No mate, you need to help the creator of the tool to make enough money from it to create a sustainable business/project
both are possible
"If I make something so great then people will still pay me even if I give it away for free!"
A tiny percentage of people might still pay for it, but the vast majority will not, and will complain loudly about any attempts to monetize.
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
Would it also capture system audio? Wasn’t there some security restrictions on that for MacOS
Audio capture support apparently available on all desktop browsers except Firefox: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/API/MediaDevice...
The MDN support table does not differentiate in this regard. (le: it actually does if you click to see the implementation notes)
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#66Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#67Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#68It's web based, offers plenty of features and can be had for a one-time of $40.
I've only used it a handful of times however I keep coming back.
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#691. At some point, the app will be covered with tonloads of ads to the point of impossibility to use
2. The core functionality will be hid behind sign-up/sign-in walls. The email addresses will be collected and then spammed to the brim
3. To add an insult to the injury, the app features will be gradually crippled unless you switch to a "Pro" plan. But you will not be able to do that efficiently as a user because you will be constantly attacked, bombarded and poisoned by ad banners and popups everywhere
4. Then, the app will start to upsell other offerings (of course, with modal banners!)
Those are cynical observations but they are 99% precise. I wish you good luck if you are among 1% elite.
Re: Show HN: I made a web-based, free alternative to Screen Studio
#70I have no connection but seeing as these conversations often discuss alternatives I'd like to mention https://screenrun.app/ . It's web based, offers plenty of features and can be had for a one-time of $40. I've only used it a handful of times however I keep coming back.