Impressively fast (honestly, that's stellar work), slightly buggy in the editor (focus is sometimes hard to determine, triple-click doesn't always select a paragraph, etc) but I assume that'll get cleared up eventually, and it's pretty good looking across the board. I might actually use this. Simple and effective and not full of crap. It could use a little bit more documentation (inter-post linking how? hardcoding mi…
Thank you - appreciate all the feedback! I invested quite a bit into speed, and thankfully Next.js has a lot of great built-in support to make things fast - incremental static regeneration, link prefetching, image optimization, etc. For the editor bugs - thanks for highlighting, I filed a bug and definitely hoping to tackle this eventually. Agreed on the documentation as well - it's on my radar to improve. For custom…
Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
61–70 of 76 posts
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#62Impressively fast (honestly, that's stellar work), slightly buggy in the editor (focus is sometimes hard to determine, triple-click doesn't always select a paragraph, etc) but I assume that'll get cleared up eventually, and it's pretty good looking across the board. I might actually use this. Simple and effective and not full of crap. It could use a little bit more documentation (inter-post linking how? hardcoding mi…
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#63Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#64$5 per month is too much on your competing services. If you want to differentiate, you should offer an option that is less. At $5 per blog, I can’t justify subbing to more than… 2 at the most. Compare the value proposition to something like Spotify.
This. I imagine there will be months when I don't write anything. Why would somebody still subscribe. Looks stellar btw.
Maybe you shouldn't be selling subscriptions for your writing if you're not actually writing?
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#65Earlier quoted context omitted.
The (seemingly) hard scarcity limit on users is where Ghost loses me. By capping your tiers at number of users you are losing a lot of people who might otherwise use your platform, imo. Here's my reasoning: You need to get lots of users to market to so that you can convert those users to paying subscribers. Getting people to sign up for notifications is one thing, getting them to pay money is a whole other propositio…
This is a good point — how would you change their pricing model then? The difficulty of supporting creators will grow with users, would a tiered model that starts charging earlier (but charges less) be better? Maybe it's better to just do a single no-bullshit price and run unlimited ghost instances for people -- and once you know the scale that a particular instance can take, different tiers for the very large instan…
I think if you're trying to cater to paid tier users, segmenting users by free/paid and only serving free tier users the cache without any sort of interactivity features is the first thing (no comment posting, no upvoting / downvoting, etc).
Finally, yes, I think the scaling cost has to be passed on to the site owner, I don't think you can shoehorn a very elastic service in terms of hardware / network demand into a fixed monthly price, without subsidizing successful users on the backs of those previously mentioned hobbyists.
Lastly, on a more philosophical level, I think media producers / publishers need to get together and stop nipping at the heels of Facebook, Twitter, Google, Amazon, and Apple like puppies following their masters around. I mean, the whole newspaper industry let itself be duped into poor staffing decisions by Facebook lies about video metrics. Which is funny considering Facebook's whole business model is taking other media businesses' ad revenue and keeping it for themselves. I guess media execs never heard the one about grandma and the big bad wolf in their MBA programs...
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#66That's what I call minimal. Unfortunately it's linked to Hey email service which I'm not using
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#67$5 per month is too much on your competing services. If you want to differentiate, you should offer an option that is less. At $5 per blog, I can’t justify subbing to more than… 2 at the most. Compare the value proposition to something like Spotify.
I think you have misunderstood. The $5/$7/$10 are suggested prices that you charge your subscribers. The service is free and only takes a 5% of subscription fees when they are active.
I made a quick mock up: https://excalidraw.com/#json=5965784438276096,bD8ptwUwiZX9o0...
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#681. I noticed that the signup email comes from papyrus.dev instead of papyrus.so. Any reason in particular for using 2 domains for the service?
2. Do you plan to support adding third-party tracking JS for services like Google Analytics, Umami etc?
3. I also shared some feedback elsewhere in the thread, not sure if you saw it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29083365
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#69Your project looks nice! 1. I noticed that the signup email comes from papyrus.dev instead of papyrus.so. Any reason in particular for using 2 domains for the service? 2. Do you plan to support adding third-party tracking JS for services like Google Analytics, Umami etc? 3. I also shared some feedback elsewhere in the thread, not sure if you saw it: https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=29083365
2. I'm not sure yet. One of the selling points is no third-party trackers, so I'm not sure how readers will feel if some of their blogs started tracking them.
3. Thanks for the feedback, and I appreciate the mockup! Agreed that section can be clearer - I've added this to the backlog.
Re: Show HN: Privacy-first, minimal, fast blogging/newsletter platform
#70Looking forward to custom domains! I signed up because of stance on privacy and no tracking and also in the same boat; want to write more.