How would this compare with pass[1], the "standard UNIX password manager"? Is it simply that SpicyPass uses newer cryptography than pass? Pass uses gpg along with the filesystem and git, so it is lightweight, and super-easy to backup offsite, as long as you guard your gpg keys separately. For those who want a GUI, QtPass[2] provides a simple GUI while using pass in the background. [1] https://www.passwordstore.org/ […
Yeah I don't see the advantages of this compared to `pass` as well. The whole source code of bash pass [1] is almost as long as a single header file [2] from this C++ software. Plus pass already handles backup... Minimalist heh. [1] https://git.zx2c4.com/password-store/tree/src/password-store... [2] https://github.com/JFreegman/SpicyPass/blob/master/src/spicy...
tl;dr different strokes for different folks. I didn't write spicypass with the intent of replacing pass.