Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

roughjs.com

61–70 of 103 posts

Re: Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

#62
post #28
post #8

In the same vein, I've been using Zwibbler ( http://zwibbler.com/demo/ ) for all the illustrations on my blog ( http://vjeux.com ) and it's been really nice to have images that look like they have been hand drawn.

It looks like you have to purchase a license to use it. The only price quoted on the page is $2999 -- a bit steep for some illustrations on a blog. Please explain.

Better than allowing that money to go to some starving artist though. They might not spend it as responsibly.

Re: Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

#64

If you repeatedly clear canvas/draw with a setInterval of ~100-200ms, looks kind of like the hand-drawn un-stable lines art style of Squigglevision (Dr. Katz / Science Court) :) EDIT: If folks want to play with a JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/49g2Leqw/9/

Reminds me of the art used in yoshi story. Awesome!

or Ed, Edd n Eddy cartoon :)

Re: Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

#65

This is a very fun library. Following the tip in these comments from @bcjordan to repeatedly re-render, I've forked a little physics notebook by Jim Bumgardner apply Rough.js to the circle rendering: https://beta.observablehq.com/@jashkenas/tumble-wheel-with-r... Wheee. Edit: Too much fun. Here's another: https://beta.observablehq.com/@jashkenas/scratchy-eyes

This is not working in Firefox. Not sure why.

[deleted]

Re: Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

#67

If you repeatedly clear canvas/draw with a setInterval of ~100-200ms, looks kind of like the hand-drawn un-stable lines art style of Squigglevision (Dr. Katz / Science Court) :) EDIT: If folks want to play with a JSFiddle: https://jsfiddle.net/49g2Leqw/9/

Hahahahaha, nice one!

Re: Show HN: RoughJS – Create hand-drawn graphics using JavaScript

#70
post #28

Earlier quoted context omitted.

It looks like you have to purchase a license to use it. The only price quoted on the page is $2999 -- a bit steep for some illustrations on a blog. Please explain.

Better than allowing that money to go to some starving artist though. They might not spend it as responsibly.

Kidding? Right?
Post reply on HN