"Crushify" is a really awkward name. And I really wish this "-ify" trend would end...it's lazy and utterly lame.
I was thinking of some API to crush image files. Or something.
Show HN: Crushify.org
51–54 of 54 posts
Re: Show HN: Crushify.org
#52Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you need to segregate based on gender, anyway? Boys can crush on boys, and girls can crush on girls. If they discover that they are a mutual crush, why deny them the fun? If you really want to filter views, let the user make a explicit decision to filer view based on gender, using a drop-down menu or something.
There comes a point where you're going overboard about privacy.
Huh? My comment was regarding same sex crushes, not privacy.
Re: Show HN: Crushify.org
#53Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you need to segregate based on gender, anyway? Boys can crush on boys, and girls can crush on girls. If they discover that they are a mutual crush, why deny them the fun? If you really want to filter views, let the user make a explicit decision to filer view based on gender, using a drop-down menu or something.
Thats to load the initial view. You can toggle between genders very conviniently. Wouldnt be a good idea to load the entire friendslist in one go.
Ah ok, fair enough. I figured you were using it to make only girls available to boys, and vice versa.
Still, if that permission is giving you problems because of people's reactions, just showing the entire friend list (with paging, of course) may not be a bad idea.
Re: Show HN: Crushify.org
#54Earlier quoted context omitted.
Why do you need to segregate based on gender, anyway? Boys can crush on boys, and girls can crush on girls. If they discover that they are a mutual crush, why deny them the fun? If you really want to filter views, let the user make a explicit decision to filer view based on gender, using a drop-down menu or something.
There comes a point where you're going overboard about privacy.
I don't know what I was thinking when I posted this.