51–56 of 56 posts
Oh claude can do this, claude can do that. It is written by claude oh it is of no value.
No. Creativity matters. Originality matters. Serendipity matters. Execution can use claude, but it is does not displace value.
Nice work!
Wow. Where was this in the 90s when I "needed" it. Is there a console version?
Lol the AGENTS.md: > NO Co-Authored-By: Claude trailer. > NO " Generated with Claude Code" footer in PR bodies, commit messages, issue comments, or anywhere else. I actually have a much better idea how to use AI responsibly: Simply don't use Claude to completely vibe code AND COMMIT your code. There is no doubt in my mind that this is vibe-coded, in the bad sense, because of this line. There is no workflow that lets…
Not sure you can go by that alone. It’s a solo project so it’s common to not use PRs in that case. People review in different ways, sometimes before the commit or at a different cadence. I get the concern, but I think it would be easy to tell if it’s responsible conclusively just by browsing around the code a bit. If it’s a mess, it’ll be obvious.
Cool project! I viewed the landing page on mobile (chrome, android) and touching to drag the globe worked once or twice, but stopped working afterwards. The globe would appear to freeze (and, actually, the whole page locked up for a second or two), but then resume rotating on its own. Seems fairly reproducible on reloading the page. Nice work!