Live data from Hacker News

Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

andreaturchet.github.io

51–60 of 99 posts

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#51

I like the idea. As others suggested it might be a good idea to drop the branding. Had the same considerations when I built a “Tinder” (1) for RSS Feeds. In the end it worked fine, if not better. (1) https://philippdubach.com/posts/rss-swipr-find-blogs-like-yo...

I think you’re right. The “TikTok” phrasing was useful shorthand for the interaction model and as provocation, but it also sends the wrong signal about the goal.

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#53
post #41

Just wanted to maybe make a light suggestions that, for marketing purposes, this really doesn't need any suggestion of TikTok and also might benefit from less heavy handed mentions of AI. I think it provides a real value proposition on its own without needing to rely on those two things to sell itself. They are pretty polarized terms at this point and I can sort of understand the initial revulsion from hearing TikTok…

I appreciate those things are mentioned front and centre, because it reveals the mindset and goals of the author, which is a useful signal. Depending on the person that signal either means “give it to me now” or “I’m going to stay far far away from this”, but either way it’s useful to know.

yeah, it's like seeing a Mastodon link instead of Twitter on a blog, you instantly know they hate everything AI

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#54

Just wanted to maybe make a light suggestions that, for marketing purposes, this really doesn't need any suggestion of TikTok and also might benefit from less heavy handed mentions of AI. I think it provides a real value proposition on its own without needing to rely on those two things to sell itself. They are pretty polarized terms at this point and I can sort of understand the initial revulsion from hearing TikTok…

[dead]

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#55

I've enjoyed consuming information about interested research papers on instagram, and insta has been good at showing me more of such content. But I think a dedicated platform would be great too! It takes such scientific content creators lots of time to create a script, hook, include animations or other visual aids and also put the research in perspective with it's potential implications in the long terms. I am not su…

careful there, you are saying blasphemerous things around these lands, that an algorithmic feed of content you dont follow can be more useful than a reverse chronological feed

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#56
post #41

Earlier quoted context omitted.

I appreciate those things are mentioned front and centre, because it reveals the mindset and goals of the author, which is a useful signal. Depending on the person that signal either means “give it to me now” or “I’m going to stay far far away from this”, but either way it’s useful to know.

yeah, it's like seeing a Mastodon link instead of Twitter on a blog, you instantly know they hate everything AI

There are plenty of reasons to not use Twitter which are unrelated to AI. And there certainly are people on Mastodon who are so into LLMs, it’s all they post about.

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#57
post #52

So it’s just a landing page…

Yeah, and things that can't be tried out are explicitly excluded by the Show HN rules: https://news.ycombinator.com/showhn.html

OP should come back once there's an actual product, assuming it ever gets past the email harvesting stage.

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#58
post #43
post #37

What I don't understand about these specialized social networks, that obviously won't exist in a few months as they won't get traction, is why not just use the existing social networks? Instead of some LinkedIn / TikTok / Facebook / Insta for X, create a group or channel in an existing network. Create a subreddit, or Facebook group or telegram channel. There are a number of existing social networks that are good at c…

> why not just use the existing social networks? Because you don’t control the existing social network, meaning you can’t exploit and profit from the users in a group¹, which is the whole point of making a digital social networks². ¹ And if you do find a way, the parent network will simply eat you up. ² Outside of a few truly ideological non-profits.

> ² Outside of a few truly ideological non-profits.

So the question stays the same: why is this not just a Mastodon server?

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#59
Extremely interesting concept. I think it will be maybe hard to get a user base due to the scientific community itself not completely being "tik tok" people. Of course there are probably hundreds of thousands if not millions of researchers using social media but its a weird feeling of almost like mixing work with personal.

In general if you keep marketing and targeting the right audience i definitely see a potential here. Good luck!

Re: Show HN: TikTok but for scientific papers

#60
post #28

I love this and wanted to build this - but https://www.alphaxiv.org/ already exists, and it gets no social action (hardly any papers have comments), so this makes me doubtful about this. I am interested to hear if anyone knows why the format may not resonate with researchers or those reading papers in general? My own reason is that to get value from a "social" site the number of interactions has to be high and of a f…

Personally, I think social media and academic publishing timescales, rewards and social conventions don't match very well. Social networking feels transient and impersonal. I would like to take some time to form my opinion about a paper, not jump in with a post. Maybe some comment box would be ok to write a couple of nice things about a paper, but it doesn't feel the place to write harsh criticism or have complex discussion where things could be misunderstood. Rather than write in the public record, if I think the paper has a deep flaw I would prefer to contact the authors first. This can be followed up by discussions in your own papers. Others may have different opinions, of course.
Post reply on HN